michaelellerbee-v-city-of-mersea-et-al

Mayflower District Court

#michaelellerbee-v-city-of-mersea-et-al

This is the start of #michaelellerbee-v-city-of-mersea-et-al channel.

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 12:16 p.m.

New Case

MichaelEllerbee v. City of Mersea, et al.

Case Type

civil

Case Number

CV-352-25

clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:08 p.m.

shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-07-21 12:16 p.m.

@singhski

shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-07-21 12:16 p.m.

case-count

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 12:20 p.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Hon’ble Judge Singhski.

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 01:33 p.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @MichaelEllerbee to the case channel.

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 01:33 p.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @meowiitten to the case channel.

singhski 2025-07-21 01:33 p.m.

@meowiitten

if you could reupload everything into this chat first

singhski 2025-07-21 01:33 p.m.

aswell as for other cases you have on my docket

meowiitten 2025-07-21 01:41 p.m.

meowiitten 2025-07-21 01:42 p.m.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ueueoMi8NcGDLGJEkb6azZ1K-SJNX9wY/view?usp=sharing

singhski 2025-07-21 02:37 p.m.

Thank you

singhski used

/summon

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 02:37 p.m.

:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @actxrz

(edited)

singhski used

/summon

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 02:38 p.m.

:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @dero

(edited)

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 02:38 p.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @actxrz to the case channel.

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 02:38 p.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @dero to the case channel.

singhski 2025-07-21 02:38 p.m.

@actxrz

@dero

actxrz 2025-07-21 02:40 p.m.

great…

dero 2025-07-21 10:40 p.m.

@meowiitten

How about we flip a coin

dero

@meowiitten How about we flip a coin

meowiitten 2025-07-23 05:19 p.m.

Well

meowiitten 2025-07-28 02:43 p.m.

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT BY THE COURT OR CLERK

@singhski @Xerxy @Nicklaus

Nicklaus 2025-07-28 02:48 p.m.

Entry of Default

Pursuant to Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 37(a), the Prothonotary's Office hereby enters Defendants’ default in this case.

/s/ Nicklaus_s
Underprothonary

meowiitten 2025-07-28 06:14 p.m.

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

@singhski

meowiitten 2025-07-28 06:14 p.m.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LXa9nC7n1a-k9J5M585AeDOKtD8t05tM5N0fn05zoAI/edit?usp=sharing

CV-352-25 Plaintiff Proposed Judgment

DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF MAYFLOWER COUNTY OF CLARK --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X MICHAELELLERBEE, : : Plaintiff, : - agains...

meowiitten 2025-07-28 07:52 p.m.

@singhski

Pleaseeeeeeuh

meowiitten

@singhski Pleaseeeeeeuh

singhski 2025-07-28 07:53 p.m.

Put my name on it

meowiitten 2025-07-28 07:59 p.m.

@singhski

Can I distribute this

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:00 p.m.

Ah no date

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:00 p.m.

One second

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:00 p.m.

There

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:07 p.m.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LXa9nC7n1a-k9J5M585AeDOKtD8t05tM5N0fn05zoAI/edit?usp=sharing

CV-352-25 Court Judgment

DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF MAYFLOWER COUNTY OF CLARK --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X MICHAELELLERBEE, : : Plaintiff, : - agains...

singhski 2025-07-28 08:11 p.m.

Yes

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:13 p.m.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bGGoj0nUHjWoPuJx_vW5QvLn7HJJirz0/view?usp=sharing

CV-352-25 Court Judgment.pdf

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-28 08:38 p.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @T4K3N to the case channel.

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-28 08:39 p.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @amigo1101 to the case channel.

singhski 2025-07-28 08:39 p.m.

@T4K3N

@amigo1101

Voice your concerns here please.

amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:39 p.m.

Nobody from the courts dmed me

amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:39 p.m.

I was never served

amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:39 p.m.

or made awair of this

meowiitten

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bGGoj0nUHjWoPuJx_vW5QvLn7HJJirz0/view?usp=sharing

singhski 2025-07-28 08:39 p.m.

Execution of judgment stayed until we resolve the servicing issue these two gentlemen have brought up

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:40 p.m.

Alright

amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:40 p.m.

Only dm I got about this was from sado himself

amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:40 p.m.

and that was just now

amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:40 p.m.

17 minutes ago

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:40 p.m.

Why didn't actxrz or dero contact you?

meowiitten

Alright

singhski 2025-07-28 08:40 p.m.

because I understand their counsel has engaged with these proceedings, so there is some understanding that they were going to litigate(edited)

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.

They are your lawyers

amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.

I dont know

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.

Well that's very bad

singhski 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.

Also not sure why the DOJ didn’t bring up this issue

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.

I don't know what to say about that

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.

Yes

singhski 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.

these two gentlemen aren’t at fault

singhski 2025-07-28 08:42 p.m.

If anything we also should have served them

dero 2025-07-28 08:42 p.m.

They have a financial interest in the outcome of this case and they were not served

dero

They have a financial interest in the outcome of this case and they were not served

singhski 2025-07-28 08:42 p.m.

But I understand we made a mistake, this could have been pointed out earlier?

Singhski

But I understand we made a mistake, this could have been pointed out earlier?

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:43 p.m.

Yes because now I've had to waste my time as well

dero 2025-07-28 08:43 p.m.

I figured they had been served. Opposing counsel has a shack and sleeping bag set up outside the court and files endlessly. We did not have the time to handle this and it slipped my mind

dero 2025-07-28 08:43 p.m.

I move to vacate the default judgment your honor and I wish for time to lodge a reply

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:43 p.m.

Are you defending the officers as well

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:43 p.m.

Or just the agencies and city

singhski 2025-07-28 08:44 p.m.

I will vacate the default judgment if you can file your reply within 48 hours @dero(edited)

dero 2025-07-28 08:44 p.m.

I will ask them if t hey want me to defend them as well one moment

dero 2025-07-28 08:44 p.m.

Thank you your honor

Singhski

I will vacate the default judgment if you can file your reply within 48 hours @dero(edited)

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:44 p.m.

I would only vacate to the officers and individual defendants

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:44 p.m.

MBI, MPD, and City lost their ability to defend and only Dero can rep them

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:44 p.m.

Or act

meowiitten

I would only vacate to the officers and individual defendants

singhski 2025-07-28 08:45 p.m.

@dero

This is also true because the cases brought against the individual defendants were void ab initio because the court lacked personal jurisdiction

singhski 2025-07-28 08:45 p.m.

Otherwise MBI, MPD and the City have lost their ability to defend

Singhski

Otherwise MBI, MPD and the City have lost their ability to defend

singhski 2025-07-28 08:46 p.m.

@meowiitten

If you could draft a new default to reflect this

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:46 p.m.

I would also like to get to the bottom of this because the SGO is supposed to certify whether or not they will rep the individual defendants yet they didn't do anything like that

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-28 08:46 p.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @redneck to the case channel.

singhski 2025-07-28 08:47 p.m.

@redneck

Chief?

redneck 2025-07-28 08:47 p.m.

Current Chief

dero 2025-07-28 08:47 p.m.

Honestly I disagree. The parties are too conflicted to do it that way

redneck 2025-07-28 08:47 p.m.

It would've been nice to be alerted when my department is being sued.

dero 2025-07-28 08:47 p.m.

All defendants are sued in both individual and official capacity along with the government bodies

singhski 2025-07-28 08:47 p.m.

I suppose you are here to also raise a servicing issue? You do not have to be alerted because you are not the entity

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:48 p.m.

He was also not the chief at the time of this lawsuit

singhski 2025-07-28 08:48 p.m.

Well you probably should be alerted by counsel

dero 2025-07-28 08:48 p.m.

Was devaxit served

dero 2025-07-28 08:48 p.m.

@meowiitten

singhski 2025-07-28 08:48 p.m.

but you wouldn’t be served

redneck 2025-07-28 08:48 p.m.

We'll the ruling was made when I was Chief, and I wasn't alerted about DevAX1T being served

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:49 p.m.

I mean if this is the case then DOJ needs to pay our costs

dero 2025-07-28 08:49 p.m.

Is the individual capacity devaxit going to stay

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:49 p.m.

Because my client paid a lot of money for this case

meowiitten

Because my client paid a lot of money for this case

dero 2025-07-28 08:50 p.m.

Then maybe you should have served everyone

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:50 p.m.

I can't serve anyone I'm the plaintiff's counsel

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:50 p.m.

That's unethical

dero 2025-07-28 08:50 p.m.

You're suing the individual police knowing that the government can't be shaken down for money like this

meowiitten

I can't serve anyone I'm the plaintiff's counsel

dero 2025-07-28 08:50 p.m.

Shouldve ensured it was done I guess

dero 2025-07-28 08:50 p.m.

Not our problem just as much as it isnt yours

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:53 p.m.

@dero

Were you planning on defending them in their official capacities they were sued in both

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:53 p.m.

And not individual

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:56 p.m.

@singhski

What do we do about the money judgment since obviously MPD, City, and MBI don't pay anything

actxrz 2025-07-28 08:58 p.m.

@dero

ts not fun no more

dero 2025-07-28 08:58 p.m.

Are we not putting a hold on that?

actxrz 2025-07-28 08:58 p.m.

we should all js resign or sum shit stg

actxrz

we should all js resign or sum shit stg

dero 2025-07-28 08:58 p.m.

Thought about it when i heard about this

actxrz 2025-07-28 08:58 p.m.

strike till sados bar is revoked(edited)

actxrz 2025-07-28 08:59 p.m.

buddy has 10 records

actxrz 2025-07-28 08:59 p.m.

he’s extremely disrespectful in chambers

actxrz 2025-07-28 08:59 p.m.

but this entire game is founded on nepotism and corruption

dero 2025-07-28 08:59 p.m.

@singhski

Are we gonna put a pin in default for now? i feel like thats the move here because the proceedings seem a little tainted by this service issue

actxrz 2025-07-28 08:59 p.m.

and the need for attention

dero

@singhski Are we gonna put a pin in default for now? i feel like thats the move here because the proceedings seem a little tainted by this service issue

meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:59 p.m.

Not against the MBI, city, or MPD we just have to figure out the money issue

dero 2025-07-28 09:00 p.m.

Did singski ever actually say the default against the city, mbi, or mpd wasnt getting paused

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:00 p.m.

Yes

dero 2025-07-28 09:00 p.m.

I remember him saying make an amended motion

Singhski

Otherwise MBI, MPD and the City have lost their ability to defend

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:00 p.m.

Here

dero 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.

Okay i want to talk about that then because I feel like I was brushed off in the chaos there

dero 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.

@singhski

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.

Well I mean you were served so what is there to talk about

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.

Truly

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.

I consent to vacating as to the individual defendants

dero 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.

the other service of process issue and the judge saying he doesnt have PJ over the individual defendants

dero 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.

dero 2025-07-28 09:02 p.m.

in that case I dont care

dero 2025-07-28 09:02 p.m.

Sure

dero

I will ask them if t hey want me to defend them as well one moment

T4K3N 2025-07-28 09:02 p.m.

Works for me

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:03 p.m.

The other thing is like

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:03 p.m.

Why didn't you go and speak with them about representation

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:03 p.m.

And just do this now

dero 2025-07-28 09:03 p.m.

Because its their choice

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:03 p.m.

So for that matter this also complicates it because you'd have to represent him in his official capacity anyway

dero 2025-07-28 09:03 p.m.

they come to us if they want representation individually

dero 2025-07-28 09:04 p.m.

and they would have if they had been served

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:04 p.m.

Nah you'd have to represent him in his official capacity anyway

dero 2025-07-28 09:04 p.m.

Sure and we were served to do that

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:06 p.m.

@singhski

What is the course of action

dero 2025-07-28 09:08 p.m.

@meowiitten

how did you come to the conclusion that these were MBI agents

dero 2025-07-28 09:08 p.m.

you dont really say

dero

@meowiitten how did you come to the conclusion that these were MBI agents

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:09 p.m.

If they're not MBI then we're just going to sue the state of mayflower or you so that someone will pay

singhski 2025-07-28 09:09 p.m.

Well the first thing we ought to recognize is that at this time this court cannot exercise personal jurisdiction over the individual defendants, i.e the ones that raised this servicing issue and any others

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:09 p.m.

I'm not doing this "you don't know so no one can pay" bs

meowiitten

If they're not MBI then we're just going to sue the state of mayflower or you so that someone will pay

dero 2025-07-28 09:09 p.m.

I mean you cant make me pay

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:10 p.m.

Ok this is just not really how it works I mean somebody has to pay

Singhski

Well the first thing we ought to recognize is that at this time this court cannot exercise personal jurisdiction over the individual defendants, i.e the ones that raised this servi...

dero 2025-07-28 09:10 p.m.

I move to vacate the individual defendants from this action and we can just proceed with the government

singhski 2025-07-28 09:10 p.m.

However, as to claims arising out of the official capacity, default must be issued because the State has essentially relinquished their ability to defend due to inaction.

Singhski

However, as to claims arising out of the official capacity, default must be issued because the State has essentially relinquished their ability to defend due to inaction.

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:11 p.m.

Like as to declaratory judgment as to each defendant?

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:11 p.m.

Or only the agencies/city

Singhski

However, as to claims arising out of the official capacity, default must be issued because the State has essentially relinquished their ability to defend due to inaction.

dero 2025-07-28 09:11 p.m.

Totally fine with this

singhski 2025-07-28 09:11 p.m.

Agencies

dero

I move to vacate the individual defendants from this action and we can just proceed with the government

singhski 2025-07-28 09:12 p.m.

dero 2025-07-28 09:12 p.m.

I want to exclude the individual defendants

dero 2025-07-28 09:12 p.m.

from the lawsuit

dero 2025-07-28 09:12 p.m.

you said you dont have jurisdiction over them so I think thats fair

singhski 2025-07-28 09:12 p.m.

We can just serve them properly

dero 2025-07-28 09:12 p.m.

i mean then we should restart this case

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:13 p.m.

The issue with this is kind of like if the agencies are liable then dev and t4k3nw are basically therefore liable in some kind of way as final policymakers

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:13 p.m.

As to their respective counts

dero 2025-07-28 09:14 p.m.

what are you trying to say

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:14 p.m.

I'm saying that they can't defend the policies

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:14 p.m.

All they can do is mitigate culpability

singhski 2025-07-28 09:14 p.m.

I mean I want to clarify the vacating defendants thing

singhski 2025-07-28 09:14 p.m.

because the plaintiff follows the forum of the defendant

dero 2025-07-28 09:15 p.m.

if we're going to proceed with defaulting the government but not the individual defendants in the same case then we should just restart

dero 2025-07-28 09:15 p.m.

and if not the individual defendants should be dismissed from this proceeding

dero 2025-07-28 09:15 p.m.

This isnt some joinder action, its one big thing and this complicates it

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:15 p.m.

If default is entered against the agencies then all they can say is like "yes the court declared that our department created a policy of deliberate indifference but I had nothing to do with it because of X"

dero

This isnt some joinder action, its one big thing and this complicates it

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.

Ok because you failed to file an answer

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.

That's why

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.

Why should I have to deal with that

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.

If you did file an answer we wouldn't be in this situation

dero 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.

if the court served everyone properly we wouldnt be in this situation either

dero 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.

and even if i did file a reply this would still be an issue

dero 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.

singhski 2025-07-28 09:18 p.m.

No I do recognise the issue because of the entities are defaulted there would be an expectation that the court would be imputing liability to the individual defendants.

dero 2025-07-28 09:19 p.m.

Okay which supports both of my claims

Singhski

No I do recognise the issue because of the entities are defaulted there would be an expectation that the court would be imputing liability to the individual defendants.

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:19 p.m.

Happens a lot more than we realize I'm sure

dero 2025-07-28 09:19 p.m.

either we dismiss the individuals and try them under a separate action or we restart completely clean slate

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:19 p.m.

1. I agree to vacating the default as to the individual defendants
2. I do not agree that it is my obligation to serve individual defendants personally
3. I can write an order granting all the relief against the agencies and city and removing the individual defendants

singhski 2025-07-28 09:19 p.m.

@meowiitten

I believe I did read something about this very situation a while ago

singhski 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.

and if I remember the authority did side with what Dero is saying

singhski 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.

I’m currently outside I will try to find it

actxrz 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.

wtf ur outside?

actxrz 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.

thats disgusting

actxrz 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.

traitor

dero 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.

Act lock in

actxrz 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.

sorry

actxrz 2025-07-28 09:21 p.m.

Actxrz for the defendants in their official capacity, your honor.

actxrz

Actxrz for the defendants in their official capacity, your honor.

dero 2025-07-28 09:21 p.m.

Shushhhhhhh

Singhski

@meowiitten I believe I did read something about this very situation a while ago

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:21 p.m.

Its Frow v. De La Vega, 82 U.S. 552 (1872)

actxrz 2025-07-28 09:21 p.m.

yoooo singhski

actxrz 2025-07-28 09:21 p.m.

u fw kitchari?

actxrz 2025-07-28 09:21 p.m.

or nah

singhski 2025-07-28 09:22 p.m.

@meowiitten

My main concern now is that entering judgment against one party might prejudice with the defenses of the remaining parties. I would defer entering final judgment on the default to circumvent inconsistent judgments or possible due process concerns if that makes sense.

singhski 2025-07-28 09:23 p.m.

With that being said, I need to know @dero how long would it take you to reply, if we were to start from scratch

Singhski

@meowiitten

@meowiitten My main concern now is that entering judgment against one party might prejudice with the defenses of the remaining parties. I would defe...

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.

The other concern is that we tolerate failing to file an answer

singhski 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.

and @meowiitten is there some sort of monetary loss for the plaintiff as the case takes longer?

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.

And missing deadlines

Singhski

and @meowiitten is there some sort of monetary loss for the plaintiff as the case takes longer?

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.

Yes

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.

He pays me 50k every 14 days

meowiitten

He pays me 50k every 14 days

singhski 2025-07-28 09:26 p.m.

So ~4K daily?

Singhski

With that being said, I need to know @dero how long would it take you to reply, if we were to start from scratch

dero 2025-07-28 09:26 p.m.

Working on it right now your honor

Singhski

So ~4K daily?

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:27 p.m.

Something like that

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:31 p.m.

And if possible I'd like to move for $28,571 in costs as a sanction

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:32 p.m.

I can attach billing

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:36 p.m.

Option 1: Hold the agencies and city liable in default in spite of Frow
Option 2: Tolerate the DOJ's neglect, but impose costs of $28,571 as a sanction for their clear failure to defend and wasting Plaintiff's time

dero 2025-07-28 09:36 p.m.

meowiitten

Option 1: Hold the agencies and city liable in default in spite of Frow Option 2: Tolerate the DOJ's neglect, but impose costs of $28,571 as a sanction for their clear failure to...

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:38 p.m.

@singhski

meowiitten

@singhski

singhski 2025-07-28 09:40 p.m.

Sybau twin. You want me to charge a late filing fee before the filing.

singhski 2025-07-28 09:40 p.m.

Cuz that’s what this is basically

singhski 2025-07-28 09:40 p.m.

Let him file

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:41 p.m.

File what

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:41 p.m.

He didn't file an answer

singhski 2025-07-28 09:41 p.m.

He is filing soon

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

Dero & actxrz -> Defends City, MBI, MPD

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

Dero & actxrz did not defend any of them

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

Default would have been entered if there were no individual defendants

singhski 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

You mean in that regard for their failure to defend

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

Yes

singhski 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

Send billing

meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.

Alright

dero 2025-07-28 09:48 p.m.

A sanction for failure to defend sounds unheard of in this court especially when it wasnt my completely my fault that we had to restart the proceedings

dero 2025-07-28 09:48 p.m.

No reason i should be paying 20k

dero 2025-07-28 09:48 p.m.

Check his heritage

Singhski

Send billing

meowiitten 2025-07-28 10:00 p.m.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x55001p4vkj9ZSR2Kc3CHog2-66opSdP/view?usp=sharing

INVOICE NO. 71825-1.pdf

dero 2025-07-28 10:29 p.m.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MIDXnFQm6HMd4mSb0moZcbhZpQmNRUjz/view?usp=sharing

RESPONSE MICHAELELLERBEE v. City of Mersea, et al..pdf

dero 2025-07-28 10:29 p.m.

@meowiitten

@singhski

dero

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MIDXnFQm6HMd4mSb0moZcbhZpQmNRUjz/view?usp=sharing

meowiitten 2025-07-28 10:53 p.m.

Can you let me know if the defendants let you rep them

meowiitten

Can you let me know if the defendants let you rep them

dero 2025-07-29 04:26 a.m.

Taken and auddortia consent

dero 2025-07-29 04:26 a.m.

ill talk to devaxit

dero 2025-07-29 12:04 p.m.

Can we add devaxit here btw

dero 2025-07-29 12:05 p.m.

he consents to my representation and wants to speak

dero 2025-07-29 12:05 p.m.

@singhski

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-29 12:05 p.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @DevAX1T to the case channel.

dero

Taken and auddortia consent

meowiitten 2025-07-29 12:05 p.m.

What about Sud and DJ

singhski 2025-07-29 12:06 p.m.

@dero

now I hope you understand that all of the individual defendants have voluntarily appeared

Singhski

@dero now I hope you understand that all of the individual defendants have voluntarily appeared

dero 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.

Yes as long as they all consent theyll have answered under my responsive pleading

meowiitten 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.

Sud and DJ need to be added I think

dero 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.

thats the intention

dero 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.

ill get with djsn

DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.

Thank you

dero 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.

But yes sudfortia has consented to me as well

DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.

I shouldve decided to stfu so I couldve gotten a mistrial

DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.

I regret this

singhski 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.

you were going to get served

singhski 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.

regardless

DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.

when bruh

singhski 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.

like right about now

DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.

can i make an oral motion @singhski

singhski 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.

I don't know, are you representing yourself?

DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.

dero is representing me but i also maintain the right to make a pro se motion regardless

DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.

do i not

DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:09 p.m.

dero is representing me

dero 2025-07-29 12:09 p.m.

@Niss

dero 2025-07-29 12:09 p.m.

Djnisnn has consented to my representation

dero 2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.

Thats all of them

DevAX1T

dero is representing me

singhski 2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.

Perhaps you should confer with counsel first

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @Niss to the case channel.

DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.

@dero

dms cuh

Singhski

Perhaps you should confer with counsel first

dero 2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.

We're good to use my answer as theirs too right

dero 2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.

Just clarifying that

dero

We're good to use my answer as theirs too right

singhski 2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.

yeah

Singhski

yeah

dero 2025-07-29 12:11 p.m.

Alright whats the next step your honor. Me and opposing counsel can get together and talk dates and issues then get you a status report

singhski used

/pretrial

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-29 12:13 p.m.

Pretrial Schedule

Discovery will be taken care of separately during the pretrial period.

Pre-trial motions will be accepted until

Wednesday, August 6, 2025 at 12:13 p.m.

or 6 months ago.

The pre-trial period will end on Friday, August 8, 2025 at 12:13 p.m. or 6 months ago.

singhski 2025-07-29 12:13 p.m.

@dero

Are you filing a MTD?

Singhski

@dero Are you filing a MTD?

dero 2025-07-29 12:14 p.m.

Ill do a deeper review with my clients about the facts and ill see if i have any mtd

dero 2025-07-29 12:14 p.m.

Cant confidently answer rn though

DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:15 p.m.

ChatGPT advised me to ask if I can be withdrawn in my individual capacity

DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:18 p.m.

ChatGPT is saying that refusing to respond to my request in a timely manner, such as within the first minute, is a severe violation of my constitutional rights.

singhski 2025-07-29 12:40 p.m.

EX PARTE DISCLOSURE

singhski 2025-07-29 12:40 p.m.

singhski 2025-07-29 12:41 p.m.

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-29 12:41 p.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @MichaelEllerbee to the case channel.

singhski 2025-07-29 12:41 p.m.

meowiitten 2025-07-29 01:25 p.m.

@singhski

Are we getting costs or naw

meowiitten 2025-07-29 01:26 p.m.

The only reason the agencies didn’t default was because of Frow

meowiitten 2025-07-29 01:26 p.m.

Otherwise they failed to respond

meowiitten 2025-07-29 06:25 p.m.

PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE THE ANSWER AND ENTER DEFAULT

@singhski @dero

dero 2025-07-29 07:03 p.m.

@singhski

maybe I can just include the affirmative defenses

dero 2025-07-29 07:04 p.m.

that seems like the most reasonable solution

dero 2025-07-29 07:04 p.m.

this is again another reach

dero

@singhski maybe I can just include the affirmative defenses

meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:06 p.m.

I explain why you can't

meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:06 p.m.

And those are also unavailable

meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:06 p.m.

And not including them is only half of the motion

meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:06 p.m.

It's broken up into quarters on different issues

dero 2025-07-29 07:06 p.m.

I mean you say it wouldnt be in timely fashion but it would be

meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.

It's broken up into quarters on different issues

dero 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.

me amending would solve half of your problems raised

meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.

That wouldn't resolve the whole thing

meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.

Only 25%

meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.

And I also explain why you can't

dero 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.

No like half your TOC is solved by me amending

meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.

You can't

meowiitten

And I also explain why you can't

dero 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.

No you explain why I shouldnt be able to

dero 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.

not why i cant

meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.

You can't without my consent or the court's leave(edited)

dero 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.

Lol okay thanks genius?

dero 2025-07-29 07:08 p.m.

Its possible that I was asking for leave when i asked the court to amend

meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:08 p.m.

Well you waited 8 days to file an answer and now here we are with a blanket general denial with no defenses raised(edited)

dero 2025-07-29 07:08 p.m.

We're crosstalking and we shouldnt I think we should just wait for your honor

dero 2025-07-29 07:08 p.m.

@singhski

meowiitten

You can't without my consent or the court's leave(edited)

AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-29 07:08 p.m.

Please don’t edit messages

meowiitten 2025-07-29 09:00 p.m.

PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE THE ANSWER AND ENTER DEFAULT

@singhski @dero

meowiitten 2025-07-29 09:00 p.m.

Reposted because of cross talk

singhski 2025-07-30 06:38 a.m.

@dero

Responding?

Singhski

@dero Responding?

dero 2025-07-30 07:35 a.m.

I'd like to amend to preserve the judicial economy

dero 2025-07-30 07:36 a.m.

Amending my response would remedy like half the issues in the motion

dero 2025-07-30 07:36 a.m.

and then I would respond to the remaining stuff

singhski 2025-07-30 07:36 a.m.

How did you forget to add this

dero 2025-07-30 07:37 a.m.

Thats my bad Dr. Singhski PhD ᴋᴄ

dero 2025-07-30 07:38 a.m.

It would take me like five minutes to fix it and would remedy most of the motion

dero 2025-07-30 07:38 a.m.

I feel like its the best option

dero 2025-07-30 07:53 a.m.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nTofyjiDtu5qwZtb_QFk8b73_gQITWxD/view?usp=sharing

RESPONSE MICHAELELLERBEE v. City of Mersea, et al. AMENDED (1).pdf

dero 2025-07-30 07:53 a.m.

@singhski

THis is an amended responsive pleading if your honor would accept that

dero 2025-07-30 07:53 a.m.

and I can respond to the remaining issues in the motion

dero 2025-07-30 07:53 a.m.

I APOLOGIZE to your honor for this

meowiitten 2025-07-30 03:24 p.m.

@singhski

Of course I object

meowiitten

PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE THE ANSWER AND ENTER DEFAULT

@singhski <@40...

meowiitten 2025-07-30 06:12 p.m.

@singhski

THis as w

dero 2025-07-31 08:51 a.m.

@singhski

Hey can i know if my amendment is accepted so I can respond appropriately

dero

@singhski Hey can i know if my amendment is accepted so I can respond appropriately

singhski 2025-07-31 11:53 a.m.

Accepted

dero 2025-07-31 07:45 p.m.

Tyvm

dero 2025-07-31 11:14 p.m.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BYi3VJ7ZR0F76b3hn9XRkdshzwfFBRua/view?usp=sharing

RESPONSE to MJP MICHAELELLERBEE v. City of Mersea, et al. .pdf

dero 2025-07-31 11:15 p.m.

@singhski

@meowiitten

dero 2025-07-31 11:15 p.m.

Obviously didnt address the moot issues fixed by amending response

meowiitten 2025-07-31 11:48 p.m.

@singhski

Do you expect me to respond to that? I mean come on

meowiitten 2025-07-31 11:49 p.m.

If you would like a reply nonetheless I will but like

meowiitten

@singhski Do you expect me to respond to that? I mean come on

dero 2025-08-01 08:18 a.m.

..? why would he? its a response to your motion

dero 2025-08-01 08:18 a.m.

nobody expects you to reply to anything

meowiitten 2025-08-01 06:14 p.m.

@singhski

Would you like me to do a reply brief or are you ready for whatever

meowiitten 2025-08-01 06:15 p.m.

Motion: https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1396888495871758438/1399919572005556326
Response: https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1396888495871758438/1400678168435888150

singhski 2025-08-01 06:15 p.m.

Sure, I don't mind

singhski 2025-08-01 06:15 p.m.

More to work with

meowiitten 2025-08-01 06:16 p.m.

Ok I’ll just make it short

meowiitten 2025-08-01 06:16 p.m.

Like 3 pages

meowiitten 2025-08-01 08:12 p.m.

PLAINTIFF’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR A JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

@singhski @dero

meowiitten 2025-08-01 08:14 p.m.

Brief Schedule
1. [PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zjQwy7xcyyjNY_KTOVUhy078s_rWeYre/view?usp=sharing)
2. [DEFENDANTS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nTofyjiDtu5qwZtb_QFk8b73_gQITWxD/view?usp=sharing)
3. [PLAINTIFF'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_INZWfMKRjaQRLEpx1s3LgrsT7q1bF8A/view?usp=sharing)

@singhski

meowiitten 2025-08-01 08:17 p.m.

Proposed judgment available upon request

meowiitten 2025-08-01 08:22 p.m.

Cognizable not cognizible in my header for Section I

dero 2025-08-02 04:04 p.m.

blahhh blah blah. All I need to say is that theres still significant factual issues that need to be worked out in this case and judgment on the pleadings isnt appropriate

meowiitten 2025-08-02 04:28 p.m.

"By its very terms, this standard provides that the mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between the parties will not defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for [judgment on the pleadings]; the requirement is that there be no genuine issue of material fact." Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-248 (1986).

meowiitten

Brief Schedule 1. [PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS](<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zjQwy7xcyyjNY_KTOVUhy078s_rWeYre/...

meowiitten 2025-08-02 04:28 p.m.

@singhski

Please ...

meowiitten

@singhski Please ...

singhski 2025-08-02 04:34 p.m.

Tomorrow

singhski 2025-08-03 07:43 a.m.

ruling today

Singhski

ruling today

meowiitten 2025-08-03 12:23 p.m.

meowiitten 2025-08-03 04:57 p.m.

@singhski

meowiitten 2025-08-03 10:39 p.m.

@singhski

singhski 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.

@meowiitten

I'm LOA since I'm leaving the country but

singhski 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.

I will try to squeeze out the opinion, if I can't in that time, I will let you know what is going to happen

meowiitten 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.

You can't leave

singhski 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.

currently I am granting the MJP so it likely will involve you just affixing my signature

meowiitten 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.

Who told you you could leave Wtf dude

singhski 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.

to your proposed judgment

meowiitten

Who told you you could leave Wtf dude

singhski 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.

My wife is pregnant IRL so

meowiitten 2025-08-04 01:34 p.m.

You're married ?????????

singhski 2025-08-04 01:34 p.m.

Yep

meowiitten 2025-08-04 01:34 p.m.

Congratulations

singhski 2025-08-04 01:34 p.m.

happily don't get any ideas

Singhski

to your proposed judgment

meowiitten 2025-08-04 01:51 p.m.

Do you want a proposed judgment with damages and the declaratory relief or a proposed order granting the MJP

meowiitten 2025-08-04 01:51 p.m.

Is that what you're asking for

Singhski

Accepted

singhski 2025-08-04 04:45 p.m.

we won't be accepting it due to undue prejudice to the plaintiff as outlined by counsel

meowiitten

Do you want a proposed judgment with damages and the declaratory relief or a proposed order granting the MJP

singhski 2025-08-04 04:48 p.m.

proposed order granting

singhski 2025-08-04 04:48 p.m.

MJP

singhski 2025-08-04 04:49 p.m.

I will release the opinion on the 10th with further reasoning, I just don't have time to revisit errors and what not

Singhski

proposed order granting

meowiitten 2025-08-04 05:03 p.m.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aMZwHnH-1SsvOKUjm0gQZrg5cAb1xXxyvikYs9grF-4/edit?usp=sharing

CV-325-25 Proposed Judgment

DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF MAYFLOWER COUNTY OF CLARK --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X MICHAELELLERBEE, : : Plaintiff, : - agains...

Singhski

currently I am granting the MJP so it likely will involve you just affixing my signature

dero 2025-08-04 07:22 p.m.

? can you like walk us through that

dero 2025-08-04 07:22 p.m.

like what

dero

? can you like walk us through that

singhski 2025-08-04 07:46 p.m.

I will walk you and your clients through this, it is awfully simple

singhski 2025-08-04 07:46 p.m.

@T4K3N

@DevAX1T

Unfortunately, the Attorney General forgot to add affirmative defenses to the response

singhski 2025-08-04 07:46 p.m.

What that means is that any defense you can make have been waived by omission(edited)

Singhski

What that means is that any defense you can make have been waived by omission(edited)

singhski 2025-08-04 07:47 p.m.

i.e, you didn't make that defense, thus you cannot rely on it later

singhski 2025-08-04 07:48 p.m.

1. The response was late
2. Amending the response at the point at which it was amended serves only to prejudice the defendant because of what @meowiitten has explained with the legal fees

Singhski

@T4K3N

@DevAX1T Unfortunately, the Attorney General forgot to add affirmative defenses to the response

singhski 2025-08-04 07:49 p.m.

Moreover, this isn't something that regularly happens, it is COMPLETELY unavoidable, and I'm honestly shocked this has even happened

singhski 2025-08-04 07:51 p.m.

and this really isn't something you can pin on the judiciary because it was your own counsel which failed to do the literal bare minimum

singhski 2025-08-04 07:52 p.m.

So to then scoff at me for rendering a decision is frankly churlish considering where you stand right now

singhski 2025-08-04 07:53 p.m.

I am disappointed with how the DOJ has handled this case.

Singhski

My wife is pregnant IRL so

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:10 p.m.

Wtf

DevAX1T

Wtf

singhski 2025-08-04 08:10 p.m.

(Joke)

Singhski

@T4K3N

@DevAX1T Unfortunately, the Attorney General forgot to add affirmative defenses to the response

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:10 p.m.

Ok so

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:10 p.m.

Mistrial

DevAX1T

Mistrial

singhski 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.

No dude, your attorney didn’t do the bare minimum

singhski 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.

you lose the case

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.

I didn’t even pick him

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.

Keep that in mind

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.

I’m being sued individually

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.

Otherwise I’d ignore this

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.

I barely play Clark Cuh

DevAX1T

I’m being sued individually

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.

I never let anyone represent me and I was never contacted to make any sort of argument

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.

@DevAX1T

Hey

singhski 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.

AG can choose to represent defendants in their individual capacity if there is an interest

meowiitten

@DevAX1T Hey

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.

Can u plz remove me individually

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.

And hi sado

singhski 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.

but your attorney didn’t even make that much clear in retrospect

Singhski

but your attorney didn’t even make that much clear in retrospect

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.

I don’t have an attorney

singhski 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.

The Attorney General is your attorney

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.

I don’t think I let anyone represent me personally

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.

For official duties idc

singhski 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.

the AG was making arguments on your behalf

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.

For individual liability I care

Singhski

the AG was making arguments on your behalf

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.

I’m being sued both individually and personally

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.

Individually and officially*

singhski 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.

and the AG is representing you in both capacities

singhski 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.

he can do that

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.

Not in my individual capacity

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.

He can ask

singhski 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.

I tell you again, he can do that

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.

AHHH

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.

@meowiitten

any chance u can be chill …

singhski 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.

gang I don’t know what I can do

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.

What am I saying in cooked

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.

I’m cooked

singhski 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.

I’ve read the proposed affirmative defenses

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.

Homie is not gonna remove me individually

singhski 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.

they probably would have been meritless anyways

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.

Can I get a tldr of the case

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:15 p.m.

Did he hit someone or something

singhski 2025-08-04 08:15 p.m.

Copy and paste into ChatGPT

DevAX1T

Can I get a tldr of the case

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:15 p.m.

Like of why the lawsuit exists rn

DevAX1T

Like of why the lawsuit exists rn

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:16 p.m.

meowiitten

Click to see attachment.

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:17 p.m.

Sado be CHIIIL

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:17 p.m.

But fr can I get a proper response

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:17 p.m.

Is there any chance you’ll be kind enough to remove me individually

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:17 p.m.

Homie doing Lego lawsuits to prepare irl yea I agree it’s a great idea

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:18 p.m.

But save me the troubleeee (individually)

T4K3N 2025-08-04 08:20 p.m.

Honestly AX1T caused this

T4K3N 2025-08-04 08:20 p.m.

He told them to do this

T4K3N

He told them to do this

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:23 p.m.

To do what

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:23 p.m.

Cuh I didn’t realize this shit existed

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:24 p.m.

I was ready to resign as of recent

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:24 p.m.

@singhski

can I add a rep here

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:24 p.m.

Lawyer

singhski 2025-08-04 08:24 p.m.

Who?

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:24 p.m.

@bladevaz

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-04 08:24 p.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @bladevaz to the case channel.

singhski 2025-08-04 08:25 p.m.

@bladevaz

I understand you are AX1T’s personal lawyer?

bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:25 p.m.

Aye

bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:25 p.m.

Salam alaykoum

bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:28 p.m.

bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:29 p.m.

@singhski

The State did not make clear, as your Honor has pointed out, whether they would be defending Mr. Ax1t and Director Taken in their individual capacity. Therefore, any claims made against their official capacity can be still contested—because my client has made it clear to me that they did not consent to representation in their individual capacities by the DOJ.

bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:31 p.m.

Your Honor, I believe this would be a due process violation, as Teken and Ax1t didn’t get a fair chance to represent themself.

bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:31 p.m.

Taken*

singhski 2025-08-04 08:38 p.m.

@meowiitten

@bladevaz

I am sympathetic to the fact that perhaps the defendants have been screwed over by the DOJ, especially because the DOJ refused to explain whether they were defending the defendants in their individual capacities, even when prompted by criticism from opposing counsel.

Singhski

@meowiitten

@bladevaz I am sympathetic to the fact that perhaps the defendants have been screwed over by the DOJ, especially because the DOJ refused to explai...

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:38 p.m.

Well that would go to default and not to the crux of the MJP

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:38 p.m.

There's two parts to the motion

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:39 p.m.

The first part is just a JOP like is the Plaintiff entitled to judgment as a matter of law

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:39 p.m.

The second part is should the answer be struck and default re-entereed

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:39 p.m.

Two is an alternative to one

meowiitten

The second part is should the answer be struck and default re-entereed

singhski 2025-08-04 08:40 p.m.

Couldn’t this fall into the harmless error doctrine?

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:40 p.m.

Not because it's analyzing the answer they filed not the court's error

bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:40 p.m.

Your Honor we are prepared to file a Motion to Reconsider

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:41 p.m.

It's motion for reconsideration not to reconsider this isn't parliament boy

bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:41 p.m.

Where’s my reactions perms .

singhski 2025-08-04 08:42 p.m.

@meowiitten

I do think we need to make sure that the consequences of mistakes follow.

singhski 2025-08-04 08:42 p.m.

Currently packing give me a moment

Singhski

@meowiitten I do think we need to make sure that the consequences of mistakes follow.

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:43 p.m.

If you're sympathetic to the plight of the individual defendants then it's worse that the AG represented to you that he gained the consent of all individual defendants to represent them

meowiitten

If you're sympathetic to the plight of the individual defendants then it's worse that the AG represented to you that he gained the consent of all individual defendants to represent...

singhski 2025-08-04 08:44 p.m.

Fwd that message here please.

Singhski

Fwd that message here please.

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:45 p.m.

Also AX1T consented to Dero

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:45 p.m.

He's kinda switching up now

bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:46 p.m.

He had to send his strongest soldier in for the battle.

meowiitten

He's kinda switching up now

singhski 2025-08-04 08:46 p.m.

@DevAX1T

singhski 2025-08-04 08:46 p.m.

Though, I’d take that with a grain of salt because the defendants don’t really know what’s going on

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:47 p.m.

This only goes to the alternative relief asked for in the motion

meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:48 p.m.

Like if the answer is so insufficient and/or useless that they would've been better off defaulting

singhski 2025-08-04 08:48 p.m.

I understand

Singhski

Though, I’d take that with a grain of salt because the defendants don’t really know what’s going on

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:05 p.m.

Okay

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:06 p.m.

I disagree with the notion that I can be represented personally without consent

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:06 p.m.

It allows the State to forcibly get me in whatever position they want and deprives me of a right to any competent counsel and due process

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:06 p.m.

However

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:06 p.m.

I did let them rep me

DevAX1T

I disagree with the notion that I can be represented personally without consent

singhski 2025-08-04 09:07 p.m.

Did you or did you not consent to the AG representing you in your individual capacity?

Singhski

Did you or did you not consent to the AG representing you in your individual capacity?

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:07 p.m.

Ok yes but in taking an issue with you saying they can without my consent

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:07 p.m.

Im* not in

Singhski

Did you or did you not consent to the AG representing you in your individual capacity?

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:08 p.m.

I forgot lmao

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:08 p.m.

Sorry I don’t play this game

DevAX1T

Sorry I don’t play this game

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:08 p.m.

Saying this genuinely

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:08 p.m.

Not as a remark

DevAX1T

Sorry I don’t play this game

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:08 p.m.

As of being removed from chief*

DevAX1T

As of being removed from chief*

bladevaz 2025-08-04 09:17 p.m.

Silence.

Singhski

@T4K3N

@DevAX1T Unfortunately, the Attorney General forgot to add affirmative defenses to the response

dero 2025-08-04 11:00 p.m.

Girl i amended it and you allowed it...?

dero 2025-08-04 11:01 p.m.

I mean theres no way you just completely forgot that right

dero 2025-08-04 11:02 p.m.

DevAX1T 2025-08-04 11:31 p.m.

lol

dero

Click to see attachment.

singhski 2025-08-05 09:54 a.m.

Hello if you read what I said after, we aren’t accepting it anymore

singhski 2025-08-05 09:54 a.m.

Hi guys I forgot the affirmative defenses sorry

singhski 2025-08-05 09:54 a.m.

I’ll bring it next time

singhski 2025-08-05 09:56 a.m.

I’m sorry but even putting aside my reasoning, I was wrong in accepting that amendment anyways because of the sheer volume of cases ruling against accepting amendments at this stage.(edited)

Singhski

Hello if you read what I said after, we aren’t accepting it anymore

dero 2025-08-05 12:31 p.m.

you didnt say that

dero 2025-08-05 12:31 p.m.

you didnt say anything

dero 2025-08-05 12:31 p.m.

you just ruled and say it now?

dero 2025-08-05 12:31 p.m.

what is this

dero 2025-08-05 12:32 p.m.

this is quite literally the most random and ill reasoned backtrack ive ever seen

dero 2025-08-05 12:34 p.m.

I cant believe youre about to sit here and totally disregard an entire amendment you allowed and then come the ruling claim it to be not a good idea and reverse it

dero 2025-08-05 12:34 p.m.

you just cant do that

dero 2025-08-05 12:39 p.m.

Is this just something youre doing so you can close this case for your vacation because its looking like it

dero

Is this just something youre doing so you can close this case for your vacation because its looking like it

singhski 2025-08-05 01:12 p.m.

I’m not sure that makes much sense, given that the pre-trial would conclude well after my return. I don’t like the mental gymnastics going on here.(edited)

Singhski

we won't be accepting it due to undue prejudice to the plaintiff as outlined by counsel

singhski 2025-08-05 01:14 p.m.

singhski 2025-08-05 01:15 p.m.

As I have said, I am reversing that previous judgment because it is completely wrong. If you want to appeal it, wait until the 10th which is when I will upload the opinion.

dero

you just cant do that

singhski 2025-08-05 01:15 p.m.

Cite the authority

singhski 2025-08-05 01:16 p.m.

I will cite mine:

“Judicial officers are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality.” Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1, Kingley Napley v. Adolobee, No. CV-0068-24, (Mayfl. Dist. Ct. Feb. 19 2025) (citing Zrihem, et al. v. TDark99, 1 Mayfl. ___, ___ (2024) (slip op., at 11) (Cabot, J., dissenting)) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Singhski

Click to see attachment.

dero 2025-08-05 01:40 p.m.

he says after 3 submitted pleadings with no ping

Singhski

I will cite mine: “Judicial officers are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality.” Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1, Kingley Napley v. Adolobee...

dero 2025-08-05 01:56 p.m.

This isnt some catch all you can throw around lol

dero 2025-08-05 01:57 p.m.

it doesnt work like that

dero 2025-08-05 01:57 p.m.

you abused your discretion by doing this and we will be appealing

dero

you abused your discretion by doing this and we will be appealing

singhski 2025-08-06 02:14 a.m.

Appeal on the 10th where I will upload my reasoning

singhski 2025-08-06 02:26 a.m.

. “[G]enerally, if an affirmative defense is not pleaded, it is waived and excluded from the case”. See Sellers v. M.C Floor Crafters, Inc. 842 F.2d 639 (2d Cir. 1988)

Note that this wording, particularly the adjective “excluded” completely denies the Defendant of the PRIVILEGE of assertion affirmative defenses. I reiterate again, this is a privilege, which you have now forfeited—I don’t see why the Plaintiff should now bear the burden of your mistake. You are no longer permitted to enter your affirmative defenses. That is the meaning of being “excluded”.

singhski 2025-08-06 02:27 a.m.

see also Satchell v. Dilworth, 745 F.2d 781, 784 (2d Cir. 1984); 5 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure Sec. 1278, at 339 (1969). J

singhski 2025-08-06 02:27 a.m.

“Where an answer has been filed and an affirmative defense has not been pleaded, the defense generally is deemed to have been waived” Hayes v. Payne,523 So. 2d 333, 335 (1987).

Singhski

. “[G]enerally, if an affirmative defense is not pleaded, it is waived and excluded from the case”. See Sellers v. M.C Floor Crafters, Inc. 842 F.2d 639 (2d Cir. 1988) Note that...

dero 2025-08-06 05:34 a.m.

focusing on the wrong issue

dero 2025-08-06 05:35 a.m.

you cant withdraw an interlocutory decision without actual good articulable reason or else its an abuse of discretion if a party relies on it

dero 2025-08-06 05:35 a.m.

so yes we will wait for the 10th

dero

you cant withdraw an interlocutory decision without actual good articulable reason or else its an abuse of discretion if a party relies on it

dero 2025-08-06 05:36 a.m.

and no "i realized it was prejudicial" is not a reason, its a conclusive statement

dero 2025-08-06 05:37 a.m.

youre just trying to make it as convenient as possible for the plaintiff to win and thats a bit unfortunate but i guess we have to deal with that

dero

you cant withdraw an interlocutory decision without actual good articulable reason or else its an abuse of discretion if a party relies on it

singhski 2025-08-06 12:44 p.m.

Which is coming? Nothing has been done yet

dero

focusing on the wrong issue

singhski 2025-08-06 12:44 p.m.

I disagree, this absolutely concerns Sado’s second option as outlined in his motion

dero

youre just trying to make it as convenient as possible for the plaintiff to win and thats a bit unfortunate but i guess we have to deal with that

singhski 2025-08-06 12:48 p.m.

The way I see it is the DOJ is trying to make up for their malfeasance.

singhski 2025-08-06 12:49 p.m.

@DevAX1T

@dero

@T4K3N

if you could also provide evidence that you agreed to full representation by the Attorney General, that would be great that way we can clear that issue up for @bladevaz

Singhski

The way I see it is the DOJ is trying to make up for their malfeasance.

dero 2025-08-06 01:17 p.m.

You have to be rage baiting

dero 2025-08-06 01:17 p.m.

simple error i corrected very quickly with your permission

dero

simple error i corrected very quickly with your permission

singhski 2025-08-06 01:19 p.m.

Ok let’s see here, when did you ask for the amendment, how many hours/days after you filed your original reply ?(edited)

Singhski

Ok let’s see here, when did you ask for the amendment, how many hours/days after you filed your original reply ?(edited)

dero 2025-08-06 01:54 p.m.

Filed my og response 7/28/2025, Plaintiff counsel raised the issue 7/29/2025, and I submitted an amended response on 7/30/2025

Singhski

@DevAX1T

@dero

@T4K3N if you could also provide evidence that you agreed to full representation by the Attorney General, that would b...

DevAX1T 2025-08-06 02:15 p.m.

My word is enough

DevAX1T 2025-08-06 02:16 p.m.

I just didn’t remember because I don’t play this game

dero

Filed my og response 7/28/2025, Plaintiff counsel raised the issue 7/29/2025, and I submitted an amended response on 7/30/2025

singhski 2025-08-06 03:46 p.m.

Thank you, I appreciate that you sent this without any remarks.

singhski 2025-08-06 03:48 p.m.

But the fact of the matter is General that our rules of procedure, as well as the Federal Rules of Procedure which we defer to when in doubt favor a waiver of affirmative defenses when not pled.

singhski 2025-08-06 03:48 p.m.

The FRCP is deafied in our common law

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-11 08:31 a.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @ian to the case channel.

ian 2025-08-11 09:01 a.m.

@singhski

Hello your honor

ian 2025-08-11 09:01 a.m.

Where are we at with this case

ian

@singhski Hello your honor

meowiitten 2025-08-11 11:51 a.m.

Waiting on a written opinion

meowiitten 2025-08-11 11:51 a.m.

Was already decided

meowiitten

Waiting on a written opinion

ian 2025-08-11 11:55 a.m.

on what

ian 2025-08-11 11:55 a.m.

what stage are we at

ian

on what

meowiitten 2025-08-11 11:56 a.m.

Motion for JOP was granted

meowiitten 2025-08-11 11:56 a.m.

Its pretrial

ian 2025-08-11 11:56 a.m.

Ok, cool

ian 2025-08-11 11:56 a.m.

when is it ending

meowiitten 2025-08-11 11:57 a.m.

Whenever the opinion is out

meowiitten 2025-08-16 02:44 p.m.

@singhski

ian 2025-08-16 08:49 p.m.

@singhski

ian 2025-08-16 08:49 p.m.

idk how long we've been waiting

ian 2025-08-16 08:49 p.m.

but

ian 2025-08-16 08:49 p.m.

I just wanted to say hi im ngl

singhski 2025-08-17 07:42 a.m.

ok today

ian 2025-08-17 10:37 a.m.

singhski 2025-08-17 07:29 p.m.

@ian

@meowiitten

Postponed to early hours tomorrow, I'm sorry, I'm working on it

singhski 2025-08-17 07:29 p.m.

5 pages so far

meowiitten 2025-08-17 07:30 p.m.

Alright

Singhski

5 pages so far

ian 2025-08-17 07:31 p.m.

Holy moly

ian 2025-08-17 07:31 p.m.

What is the ruling even about

singhski 2025-08-17 07:32 p.m.

I am not pulling an Awesome, promise

meowiitten

Brief Schedule 1. [PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS](<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zjQwy7xcyyjNY_KTOVUhy078s_rWeYre/...

meowiitten 2025-08-17 07:33 p.m.

This

User

Message could not be loaded.

singhski 2025-08-18 10:56 a.m.

Cc: @ian

@meowiitten

ian 2025-08-18 11:11 a.m.

uh oh

ian 2025-08-18 11:12 a.m.

ok we await your order your honor @singhski thank you

ian

ok we await your order your honor @singhski thank you

singhski 2025-08-18 11:13 a.m.

Order is here

ian 2025-08-18 11:13 a.m.

"3. An accompanying Order will issue, setting forth and underlining the terms of this disposition."

singhski 2025-08-18 11:14 a.m.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F-pjutzXqJAfdLjgL9aVbbrWS5N2vDnT/view?usp=sharing

singhski 2025-08-18 11:14 a.m.

@ian

ian 2025-08-18 11:15 a.m.

oh my oh my oh my oh my

ian 2025-08-18 11:16 a.m.

@singhski

I'm a little confused here pardon me

ian 2025-08-18 11:16 a.m.

we're in default then

singhski 2025-08-18 11:16 a.m.

Yes.

Singhski

Yes.

ian 2025-08-18 11:20 a.m.

What are the damages

ian 2025-08-18 11:20 a.m.

We'll have a hearing I presume

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:29 a.m.

I really need to go rogue

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:29 a.m.

I am not fond of you @meowiitten

ian 2025-08-18 11:29 a.m.

dev

ian

dev

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:32 a.m.

I’m not paying anything lol

ian 2025-08-18 11:32 a.m.

dev can you talk in dms

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:32 a.m.

I’ll admit sado is hilarious for suing but I want him to do it more instead of stopping more

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:32 a.m.

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:33 a.m.

I’m not actually going rogue

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:33 a.m.

I’m just quitting before I’m indefinitely jailed for failing to comply with a court ruling

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:33 a.m.

I don’t play Clark anyway so it’s not the biggest deal

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:34 a.m.

I’m annoyed singhski allows everything by sado to fly without any checks of his own to ensure ransoms aren’t added to a lawsuit

DevAX1T

I’m annoyed singhski allows everything by sado to fly without any checks of his own to ensure ransoms aren’t added to a lawsuit

singhski 2025-08-18 11:36 a.m.

You should be annoyed that the DOJ didn't file affirmative defenses

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:36 a.m.

I’m annoyed at everyone

singhski 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.

and denied 84 paragraphs

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.

I’m annoyed sado doesn’t sue more

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.

I’m annoyed that idfk if this can even be appealed

singhski 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.

also Sado wanted judgment on the pleadings, the default was alternative to that

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.

I’m annoyed that I was added even though I have no personal responsibility in this

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.

He just added people because he could and you’re brown nosing it all

singhski 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.

I granted the default because the DOJ didn't file affirmative defenses

singhski 2025-08-18 11:38 a.m.

dude! tell it to your attorney

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:38 a.m.

You can’t argue that fail to supervise an employee is a personal failure.

singhski 2025-08-18 11:38 a.m.

Sure, should have put it in the defenses

singhski 2025-08-18 11:38 a.m.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Singhski

dude! tell it to your attorney

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:38 a.m.

I am crashing out

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-18 11:38 a.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @violet ♡ to the case channel.

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.

For a game I don’t even play

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.

Who is that

singhski 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.

Court Therapist added. @violet ♡ please speak to Mr. Ax1t in DMs.

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.

Lmaoo

Singhski

dude! tell it to your attorney

ian 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.

what am I gonna do

ian

what am I gonna do

singhski 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.

this is not your fault

ian 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.

I know I wasn't even here

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.

The best thing is to appeal to SC but idk if u can

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.

I’m thinking of default judgement where SC won’t touch that

ian 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.

appeal what

ian

appeal what

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.

What do you think Cuh

ian 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.

like this is literally how it goes

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.

The case

ian 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.

procedure was followed to the letter here from what Im seeing

ian 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.

this is what happens when a counsel doesn't do the things he's supposed to

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.

Can I not argue my attorney was incompetent or something

ian 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.

we can't appeal to SC and say sorries we're better now

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.

Give civil trials a right to a fair trial too fr

DevAX1T

Can I not argue my attorney was incompetent or something

ian 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.

lowk

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.

Anyway

ian 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.

I do wish I was an internet criminal so I can take petty actions as a result of this

ian 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.

we can set aside default judgment but Im not sure if that applies

ian 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.

ill have to read a bit

ian 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.

but you should talk in the gc

singhski 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.

Yes, we will have a hearing @ian

@meowiitten

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:42 a.m.

I’m going to now lose my fucking mind at my mom who woke me up early and continues to sabotage my alertness for my job

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:42 a.m.

Kill meeeeeeeeeeee

ian 2025-08-18 11:42 a.m.

@singhski

can I ask

singhski 2025-08-18 11:42 a.m.

@violet ♡

Ms Violet please.

ian 2025-08-18 11:42 a.m.

what "rule 1.540(b)" is

singhski 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.

Where

ian 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.

uhm??

ian 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.

rule 37

ian 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.

LOL what

ian 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.

they forgot to change it when copying and pasting from FRCP probably(edited)

singhski 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.

LOL

ian 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.

Ill check there

ian 2025-08-18 11:44 a.m.

"(c) Setting Aside a Default or a Default Judgment. The court may set aside an entry of default for good cause, and it may set aside a final default judgment under Rule 60(b)."

ian

Click to see attachment.

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:44 a.m.

It’s Florida rule

ian 2025-08-18 11:44 a.m.

so the standard is just good cause

meowiitten

It’s Florida rule

ian 2025-08-18 11:44 a.m.

how do you know every state's laws dude

ian 2025-08-18 11:44 a.m.

ok Ill check

Singhski

Yes, we will have a hearing @ian @meowiitten .

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:45 a.m.

On damages for default?

singhski 2025-08-18 11:45 a.m.

Yes

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:45 a.m.

Alright

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:46 a.m.

Let me get the video and then I’ll do timestamps to break up and explain each incident

ian 2025-08-18 11:46 a.m.

ok so it's just

ian 2025-08-18 11:46 a.m.

59(e)

ian 2025-08-18 11:46 a.m.

but Florida counterpart

ian 2025-08-18 11:47 a.m.

ian 2025-08-18 11:48 a.m.

@singhski

Would this court entertain a motion to set aside as if the order entering default was final, or would we have to wait until after the hearing

ian 2025-08-18 11:48 a.m.

Because this only applies to final orders

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:48 a.m.

I made fraud on the court I’m ngl so

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:48 a.m.

You can do that

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:48 a.m.

Pro se MTD for fraud on the court

ian 2025-08-18 11:48 a.m.

it's not fraud

ian 2025-08-18 11:49 a.m.

unless I raise it later

ian 2025-08-18 11:49 a.m.

it's most likely going to be rule (b)(1)

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:49 a.m.

I’m saying I did fraud

ian 2025-08-18 11:50 a.m.

what

ian 2025-08-18 11:50 a.m.

why would you say that

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:50 a.m.

That’s none of your business

ian 2025-08-18 11:51 a.m.

https://tenor.com/view/kanye-haircut-gif-13493655861151569035

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:52 a.m.

@singhski

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:53 a.m.

The complaint follows this video basically step by step

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:55 a.m.

Also as to evidence that they were state agents (1) look at the DOJ leaderboard, (2) you can guy with a “police” vest on in the passenger seat at 0:02, (3) the MBI denied the FOIA request to identify the agents because it would “give up the confidentiality of an operation” or something like that

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:55 a.m.

And they’re police vehicles

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:55 a.m.

And an MPD officer later said they were MBI agents

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:55 a.m.

Anyways

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:55 a.m.

That’s enough circumstantial evidence

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:56 a.m.

The video itself just shows the facts of the complaint

meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:57 a.m.

Regardless they are not private persons and that’s all that matters here

meowiitten

@singhski

ian 2025-08-18 11:58 a.m.

oh my

ian 2025-08-18 11:58 a.m.

I hate dero for not letting me try this

meowiitten

Also as to evidence that they were state agents (1) look at the DOJ leaderboard, (2) you can guy with a “police” vest on in the passenger seat at 0:02, (3) the MBI denied the FOIA ...

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:00 p.m.

Also they already admitted all this stuff by default so

meowiitten

I’m saying I did fraud

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:07 p.m.

Chat is sado a homie

meowiitten

Also they already admitted all this stuff by default so

ian 2025-08-18 12:08 p.m.

it's a lawsuit against the government so the bar is a bit higher

ian 2025-08-18 12:08 p.m.

you still have to show somewhat that it happened

ian 2025-08-18 12:08 p.m.

not the same standard at trial but it's also not admitted automatically

ian

@singhski Would this court entertain a motion to set aside as if the order entering default was final, or would we have to wait until after the hearing

ian 2025-08-18 12:08 p.m.

@singhski

ian

not the same standard at trial but it's also not admitted automatically

singhski 2025-08-18 12:09 p.m.

True but the point of trial is so that it’s not admitted automatically. By waiving defenses you don’t get that opportunity.

ian

@singhski Would this court entertain a motion to set aside as if the order entering default was final, or would we have to wait until after the hearing

singhski 2025-08-18 12:09 p.m.

On what basis?

Singhski

True but the point of trial is so that it’s not admitted automatically. By waiving defenses you don’t get that opportunity.

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:09 p.m.

if this shit works

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:09 p.m.

can i blatantly sue people who arent involved at all

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:09 p.m.

and hope they dont make an affirmative defense

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:09 p.m.

if so im gonna fucking do that until the game dies thats awesome

singhski 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.

No because this never happens

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.

ok well it IS Happening

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.

To me Cuh

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.

he is suing mpd for something mbi did

Singhski

On what basis?

ian 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.

mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect

Singhski

True but the point of trial is so that it’s not admitted automatically. By waiving defenses you don’t get that opportunity.

ian 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.

you kinda do as the government though

ian 2025-08-18 12:11 p.m.

you dont get the same opportunity admittedly

ian 2025-08-18 12:11 p.m.

but you get one

meowiitten

I made fraud on the court I’m ngl so

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:11 p.m.

was this fraud specifically pertaining to adding me/mpd to the lawsuit

Singhski

No because this never happens

ian 2025-08-18 12:11 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/chud-chudjak-wojak-soyjak-marcvin5-gif-13903021270190271130

DevAX1T

can i blatantly sue people who arent involved at all

ian 2025-08-18 12:12 p.m.

yeah but if the court finds out youre in contempt and for future cases you need to submit an affidavit saying its not frivolous

ian 2025-08-18 12:12 p.m.

im not sure if the affidavit thing is here too

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:12 p.m.

he is literally suing us for mbi did

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:12 p.m.

how does he have standing

ian 2025-08-18 12:13 p.m.

he got default

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:14 p.m.

iif theres no standing the court cant act

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:15 p.m.

the court cant exercise jurisdiction in that circumstance

singhski 2025-08-18 12:15 p.m.

Everything you are saying should have been plead as affirmative defenses.

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:15 p.m.

the court has to satisfy of itself jurisdiction sua sponte

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:16 p.m.

its a reverseable error not to

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:16 p.m.

i cannot sue the country of britain in new york and get default judgement

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:16 p.m.

if so im gonna fuckin do that

DevAX1T

he is literally suing us for mbi did

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.

The actual theory is that your officers failed to intervene because of supervisory negligence + deliberate indifference (by the city) which included refusing to discipline officers who had instances of misconduct in the past

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.

And it was the moving force as we allege

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.

However you admit to all of this by default

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.

there is no duty to intervene by LE

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.

where did you get that from

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.

No way?

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.

Lol

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:18 p.m.

theres no constitutional duty*

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:18 p.m.

but something tell sme you did not argue that

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:18 p.m.

Well you’re going to learn pretty quickly that there is

ian 2025-08-18 12:18 p.m.

ax1t

ian 2025-08-18 12:18 p.m.

pls

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:18 p.m.

what case @meowiitten

ian

pls

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:19 p.m.

No im a good lawyer for a moment trust

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:19 p.m.

Only for a moment though

DevAX1T

No im a good lawyer for a moment trust

ian 2025-08-18 12:19 p.m.

You mean chatgpt is a good lawyer

ian 2025-08-18 12:20 p.m.

standing is not a jurisdictional defect, it's a merits one

ian 2025-08-18 12:20 p.m.

if not raised it's waived

ian 2025-08-18 12:20 p.m.

unlike suing the country of britain in new york

ian 2025-08-18 12:20 p.m.

because sovereign immunity IS a jurisdictional defect

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:20 p.m.

soverign immunity doesnt apply to an external country

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:20 p.m.

i did not spell sovereign right

ian 2025-08-18 12:21 p.m.

uhm

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:21 p.m.

when was standing a merits issue

ian 2025-08-18 12:21 p.m.

can u please talk to me in dms

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:21 p.m.

ian 2025-08-18 12:21 p.m.

wait lowk standing might be jurisdictional

ian 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.

bc of art iii

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.

cuh

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.

lmaoo

ian

wait lowk standing might be jurisdictional

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.

it is

ian 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/autistic-gif-17151782255244910056

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.

scotus said jurisdiction CANNOt be waived

ian 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.

ok we will address that

ian 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.

pls

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.

even if both parties agree

ian 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.

dms

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.

This courtroom is my therapy

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:23 p.m.

If you wanna say a city and police department can’t be sued be my guest

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:23 p.m.

And police chief

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:23 p.m.

oh no they can

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:23 p.m.

absolutely

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

but u cant sue for police not intervening

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

what case do u have

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

Bro

meowiitten

If you wanna say a city and police department can’t be sued be my guest

ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

it's a township actually

ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

so of the county

ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

sir

meowiitten

Bro

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

its a simple question

ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

it's still a lesser head for the purpose of SI tho but

ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

yea

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

u already admitted to fraud tahts enough to get a mistrial

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

it is not enough nvm

ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

mistrial

ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

what

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

IGNORE THAT @ian

ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

We didnt even get a mistrial

DevAX1T

but u cant sue for police not intervening

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

@ian

Do you want me to explain it to him or do you want to(edited)

ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

dev please

ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

he doesnt listen to me

meowiitten

@ian Do you want me to explain it to him or do you want to(edited)

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

npz just said that standing can be waived

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.

how about u explain it

ian 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.

Ok buddy

ian 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.

youre getting a free lawyer I would not push it

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.

UR CHILL i just want to know what sado is thinking @ian

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.

sorry sorry

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.

im crashing out idk what to do

ian 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.

just wait for us to set aside default n stuff

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.

this comes after some cunt made me change my email because they spammed it with mailinglists

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.

"It is widely recognized that all law enforcement officials have an affirmative duty to intervene to protect the constitutional rights of citizens from infringement by other law enforcement officers in their presence." Anderson v. Branen, 17 F.3d 552, 557 (2d Cir. 1994).

DevAX1T

this comes after some cunt made me change my email because they spammed it with mailinglists

ian 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.

LMAO THIS HAPPENED TO ME

meowiitten

"It is widely recognized that all law enforcement officials have an affirmative duty to intervene to protect the constitutional rights of citizens from infringement by other law en...

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.

thats not binding

ian 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.

I gave orange my email

ian 2025-08-18 12:26 p.m.

suddenly I have 2500 daily notifications from Reddit

DevAX1T

thats not binding

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:26 p.m.

DevAX1T

thats not binding

ian 2025-08-18 12:26 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/black-guy-whtie-and-black-cry-praying-looking-up-gif-553441503240360994

ian 2025-08-18 12:26 p.m.

PLEASE

ian 2025-08-18 12:26 p.m.

please.

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:28 p.m.

@singhski

Are you satisfied with the evidence do you want me to make an order

meowiitten

@singhski Are you satisfied with the evidence do you want me to make an order

singhski 2025-08-18 12:29 p.m.

Well, all of the evidence will be taken into consideration at the hearing.

singhski 2025-08-18 12:30 p.m.

what is the order for?

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:30 p.m.

Oh I didn’t know you wanted an actual hearing

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:30 p.m.

Usually they just ask me for evidence

Singhski

Well, all of the evidence will be taken into consideration at the hearing.

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:31 p.m.

When would this hearing be and I assume that the government will not be present

meowiitten

When would this hearing be and I assume that the government will not be present

singhski 2025-08-18 12:36 p.m.

The government is entitled to notice and can appear at the hearing(edited)

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:37 p.m.

Okay so when is it

meowiitten

Okay so when is it

singhski 2025-08-18 12:38 p.m.

How about in 20-30 minutes? @ian

singhski 2025-08-18 12:38 p.m.

I can vc then, npz doesn't have to

meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:39 p.m.

Ah I can’t really vc but I can type

singhski 2025-08-18 12:40 p.m.

Sure, I mean we can conduct it asynchronously

ian 2025-08-18 12:42 p.m.

I cant vc either @singhski

ian 2025-08-18 12:42 p.m.

but asynchronously is good

meowiitten 2025-08-18 01:05 p.m.

@singhski

I’m ready

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 01:12 p.m.

@singhski

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 01:12 p.m.

plz add @Kenzie

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 01:12 p.m.

she is counsel

DevAX1T

plz add @Kenzie

ian 2025-08-18 01:14 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/nile-red-ice-cream-sandwich-eating-me-eating-muck-gif-13114499138826834227

ian

https://tenor.com/view/nile-red-ice-cream-sandwich-eating-me-eating-muck-gif-13114499138826834227

meowiitten 2025-08-18 01:15 p.m.

You letting him disrespect you

meowiitten 2025-08-18 01:15 p.m.

Like that

meowiitten 2025-08-18 03:22 p.m.

@singhski

singhski used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-18 03:22 p.m.

Case Modified

@singhski

has added @Kenzie to the case channel.

ian 2025-08-18 03:56 p.m.

@singhski

luhv needs to file a request for substitution of counsel if she wants to appear

ian 2025-08-18 03:56 p.m.

Ive informed her of such

ian 2025-08-18 03:56 p.m.

a notice of appearance is not due where the party is already represented in the record

ian

@singhski luhv needs to file a request for substitution of counsel if she wants to appear

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 04:59 p.m.

I can have multiple lawyers

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 04:59 p.m.

I do ask the court to remove @bladevaz and @ian as my individual counsel and let @Kenzie represent me individually

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:00 p.m.

@singhski

DevAX1T

I do ask the court to remove @bladevaz and @ian as my individual counsel and let @Kenzie represent me individually

ian 2025-08-18 05:01 p.m.

your new attorney needs to file a request for substitution of counsel, like I already told her and like I said here

ian 2025-08-18 05:01 p.m.

and I represent the rest of the defendants anyway so Im not going to be removed ?

ian 2025-08-18 05:01 p.m.

@Kenzie

ian

your new attorney needs to file a request for substitution of counsel, like I already told her and like I said here

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:02 p.m.

I don’t believe so

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:02 p.m.

Also the county should still be representing me officially

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:02 p.m.

I’m not messing with anything in my official capacity. As far as I care the city can burn RAHHH

DevAX1T

I don’t believe so

ian 2025-08-18 05:02 p.m.

okay

ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.

uhm they do

ian

uhm they do

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.

Where

DevAX1T

Also the county should still be representing me officially

ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.

you're not sued officially

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.

I am

ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.

I’m sued in both capacities

ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.

you're sued for negligent hiring which is an individual capacity tort

ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.

you're not sued in your official capacity

ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.

I explained this to your attorney

ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.

please communicate with your attorney

ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.

I am sensing here a continued lack of communicating with whoever your attorney is

ian 2025-08-18 05:04 p.m.

please communicate with your attorney and sort this out with her

ian 2025-08-18 05:04 p.m.

she needs to file a request for substitution of counsel

DevAX1T

Where

ian 2025-08-18 05:04 p.m.

Here

ian 2025-08-18 05:04 p.m.

this is the case

ian 2025-08-18 05:04 p.m.

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:08 p.m.

Cuh

ian

you're sued for negligent hiring which is an individual capacity tort

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:08 p.m.

Literally both capacities

DevAX1T

Click to see attachment.

ian 2025-08-18 05:08 p.m.

should I even keep talking to you at this point

ian 2025-08-18 05:08 p.m.

scroll down

ian 2025-08-18 05:08 p.m.

the only torts you are named in is negligent hiring which is individual capacity

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:09 p.m.

Stll listed

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:09 p.m.

Still listed

ian 2025-08-18 05:09 p.m.

doesn't matter

ian 2025-08-18 05:09 p.m.

it's wrong then

ian

it's wrong then

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:09 p.m.

Yes but the judge won’t care

ian 2025-08-18 05:10 p.m.

what exactly do you want me to defend on your behalf

ian 2025-08-18 05:10 p.m.

for your official capacity

ian 2025-08-18 05:10 p.m.

you want me to appear on your behalf to defend nothing?

ian 2025-08-18 05:10 p.m.

Please let your attorney file her request for substitution

ian 2025-08-18 05:10 p.m.

and go through her

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:49 p.m.

@singhski

Singhski

what is the order for?

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:49 p.m.

Order would just be a proposed order for default judgment like listing the actual damages

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:49 p.m.

But

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:49 p.m.

We didn't do the hearing you wante

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:49 p.m.

Tbh @ian if you wanna move to vacate just do it now in writing

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:50 p.m.

And that way singhski can just look at the evidence

ian 2025-08-18 09:51 p.m.

@singhski

Im having issues with the defendants

ian 2025-08-18 09:52 p.m.

apparently some of them want to get new lawyers or idk what's happening

meowiitten

@singhski

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:52 p.m.

Could u be kind and remove me individually

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:52 p.m.

Plz

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:52 p.m.

King sado

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:52 p.m.

(I am a suckup rn)

ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.

@singhski

I just saw the group chat

ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.

Uhm. yea

singhski 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.

I was added to a gc called Michaelelerbee v. MPD, before I could disclose ex parte comms I was removed.

ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.

I will be respectfully withdrawing as counsel for all individual capacities in this case due to the obvious

ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.

conflict of interest

ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.

that has arisen

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.

Yo wtf 16mil LMAOO

Singhski

I was added to a gc called Michaelelerbee v. MPD, before I could disclose ex parte comms I was removed.

ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.

can't disclose that

ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.

it's privilege

ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.

a lot of it is privileged

ian

can't disclose that

singhski 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.

Just the part where I spoke

ian 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.

ok Ill send

singhski 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.

dude that was not privileged…method 1 was not…

ian 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.

Singhski

dude that was not privileged…method 1 was not…

ian 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.

it's

ian 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.

yes it's privileged

ian 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.

scrolling up half a second shows the privileged info

ian 2025-08-18 09:55 p.m.

can I have you hold tactical in contempt @singhski

ian

can I have you hold tactical in contempt @singhski

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:55 p.m.

For what

singhski 2025-08-18 09:55 p.m.

Thought it was a troll gc after I saw method 1

Singhski

Thought it was a troll gc after I saw method 1

ian 2025-08-18 09:55 p.m.

what's method 1

ian

can I have you hold tactical in contempt @singhski

singhski 2025-08-18 09:55 p.m.

don’t you represent him

Singhski

Thought it was a troll gc after I saw method 1

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:56 p.m.

I also saw it

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:56 p.m.

singhski 2025-08-18 09:56 p.m.

Method 1. Those who know.

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:56 p.m.

What's method 2

singhski 2025-08-18 09:56 p.m.

I don’t think

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.

Its ok I waive ex parte because I am aware of um

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.

Well

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.

You know

Singhski

don’t you represent him

ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.

singhski 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.

Method 1?

ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.

I represent the MPD

ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.

as an extension of the county government

ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.

(it's the police department of the township)

ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.

(townships are part of counties)

ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.

he was just in because he's the current chief

ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.

this raises serious concerns though

Singhski

Method 1. Those who know.

ian 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/benjammins-meme-people-who-dont-know-people-who-know-ignorance-gif-8649971421499266649

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.

Alright well I would like to do this hearing man ...

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.

Man ...

singhski 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.

I can’t after I just saw method 1.

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.

Man 16mil for this is

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.

Insane

ian 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.

no seriously this is like

ian 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.

Bro what

ian 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.

Is method 1

ian 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.

what is that

ian 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.

What are you talking about your honor

meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/diddy-diddy-stare-stare-diddy-baby-oil-puff-daddy-gif-15764673949371655817

singhski 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/dr-umar-gif-833688080316617677

ian 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.

ok so here's what happened @singhski

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.

I think sing and sado are messing around in dms

ian 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.

1. many parties

ian 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.

2. we have GC

ian 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.

3. MPD is party, so their rep redneck is added

ian 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.

4. redneck says he doesnt want me representing him and adds his counsel

ian 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.

5. privileged conversations

ian 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.

6. redneck goes rogue and adds the plaintiff?? and a bunch of other people that start spamming the gc (and you)

DevAX1T

I think sing and sado are messing around in dms

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.

Npz can say that was not the case

meowiitten

Npz can say that was not the case

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.

Idk

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.

I just don’t want to pay sixteen million

meowiitten

Npz can say that was not the case

singhski 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.

Nope Npz eyes were not blessed by method 1.

ian

6. redneck goes rogue and adds the plaintiff?? and a bunch of other people that start spamming the gc (and you)

ian 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.

@singhski

Ill really need him in contempt

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.

but SOMEONE

ian 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.

this isnt acceptable

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.

is ignoring any request I have to remove me as a defendant

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.

16 million is maximum exposure to punitive damages so it actually could be more you never know

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.

Because it is hilarious

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.

And I agree it is hilarious

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.

But not when I am on the paying side of it

DevAX1T

is ignoring any request I have to remove me as a defendant

ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.

I already told your new attorney to file a substitution

ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.

like a million times

ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.

that's how it works(edited)

ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.

she needs to file a substitution or it's not in the record

ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.

NOA doesn't suffice

singhski 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.

I honestly don’t mind

ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.

if she can't file a substitution

singhski 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.

the record for this case is method 2 ngl

ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.

imagine how she's gonna do going up against sado

ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.

ian 2025-08-18 10:02 p.m.

in a case in which default was already entered

ian 2025-08-18 10:02 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/please7tv-please-beg-pray-hope-gif-3860103425950934673

ian

imagine how she's gonna do going up against sado

singhski 2025-08-18 10:02 p.m.

But that’s for her to handle. I said I don’t mind.

ian 2025-08-18 10:02 p.m.

alr

ian 2025-08-18 10:02 p.m.

anyways Id like to revisit the contempt ordeal

singhski 2025-08-18 10:02 p.m.

Is it definitely a she? -tucks in chair-

ian 2025-08-18 10:03 p.m.

yeah

ian 2025-08-18 10:03 p.m.

well deep down I know women don't really exist

ian 2025-08-18 10:03 p.m.

but a man can hope

singhski 2025-08-18 10:04 p.m.

@meowiitten

We probably don’t even need a hearing.

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:04 p.m.

Yeah. You're right.

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:04 p.m.

-Starts crying tears of joy

ian 2025-08-18 10:05 p.m.

@singhski

PLEASE

ian 2025-08-18 10:05 p.m.

The contempt

singhski 2025-08-18 10:06 p.m.

I am not contempting him. He has already gone through so much in this case.

ian 2025-08-18 10:06 p.m.

he is not even being sued

ian 2025-08-18 10:06 p.m.

it's MPD

ian 2025-08-18 10:06 p.m.

he wont suffer at all

ian 2025-08-18 10:06 p.m.

bc the govt cant pay damages

ian 2025-08-18 10:06 p.m.

are you kidding

singhski 2025-08-18 10:07 p.m.

First MPD’s counsel doesn’t file affirmative defenses and then he sees method 1

ian 2025-08-18 10:07 p.m.

what

ian 2025-08-18 10:07 p.m.

is method one

ian 2025-08-18 10:07 p.m.

ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.

lowk im gonna just withdraw from this case and everyone can have it their way

ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.

because honestly what is this

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.

I don’t have sixteen million

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.

What now

ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.

Im actually just tryinna help these guys who r being sued and larp a bit but they bombard my DMs and post porn gifs???

ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.

and they say Im a bad lawyer and get new ones

ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.

like Im done bro

ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.

Im crashing out

ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.

npz crash out

ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/peter-griffin-crash-out-angry-gif-15667791719891680630

ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.

singhski 2025-08-18 10:09 p.m.

How can you forget to file affirmative defenses and then get angry that I didn’t accept the amended answer as if aff defenses are substantive rights rather than privileges(edited)

Singhski

How can you forget to file affirmative defenses and then get angry that I didn’t accept the amended answer as if aff defenses are substantive rights rather than privileges(edited)

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:09 p.m.

I have 10k to my name Cuh

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:09 p.m.

What note

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:09 p.m.

Now

Singhski

How can you forget to file affirmative defenses and then get angry that I didn’t accept the amended answer as if aff defenses are substantive rights rather than privileges(edited)

ian 2025-08-18 10:09 p.m.

I didnt forget, and subsequently I didnt get angry

ian 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/kanye-ye-haircut-barber-kanye-west-gif-3642931043953307478

DevAX1T

I have 10k to my name Cuh

singhski 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.

Well I still need to assess damages

ian

I didnt forget, and subsequently I didnt get angry

singhski 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.

*DOJ

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.

16mil for this is insane

Singhski

*DOJ

ian 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.

yeah on god they're

ian 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.

they're something

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.

Keep in mind I didn’t do anything

ian 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.

ok let me review sm rq

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.

I’m just here because sado thought he could add me here

ian 2025-08-18 10:11 p.m.

ok so

ian 2025-08-18 10:11 p.m.

here's what Im gonna do

ian 2025-08-18 10:11 p.m.

Im gonna stay

ian 2025-08-18 10:11 p.m.

representing city of mersea

ian 2025-08-18 10:11 p.m.

(township, not city @meowiitten)

ian 2025-08-18 10:11 p.m.

uh,

Singhski

Well I still need to assess damages

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:12 p.m.

Can I just show you the video again and then list off damages for each count that we seek

ian 2025-08-18 10:12 p.m.

yeah and thats it

ian 2025-08-18 10:12 p.m.

wait

ian 2025-08-18 10:12 p.m.

yup . that's it

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:12 p.m.

Obviously we don't need to establish facts since they admitted to everything

ian 2025-08-18 10:12 p.m.

Im only defending township of mersea @singhski I withdraw from everything else

ian 2025-08-18 10:13 p.m.

since the defendants deserve to be sodomized against their will

ian 2025-08-18 10:13 p.m.

honestly

ian 2025-08-18 10:13 p.m.

I would love it if you gave me a chance to move to set aside the default tomorrow, I'll present a good case on behalf of the county

ian 2025-08-18 10:13 p.m.

but the rest of the defendants aren't my concern at this point

ian 2025-08-18 10:13 p.m.

I'm tired

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:14 p.m.

Attempt #3

meowiitten

Obviously we don't need to establish facts since they admitted to everything

ian 2025-08-18 10:14 p.m.

you do

ian 2025-08-18 10:14 p.m.

it's a suit against the governmetn

redneck 2025-08-18 10:15 p.m.

Your Honor, could you please check your direct messages.

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:15 p.m.

The standard is "evidence that satisfies the court."

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:15 p.m.

That could be a scintilla

redneck

Your Honor, could you please check your direct messages.

ian 2025-08-18 10:15 p.m.

@singhski

Ill need that ex parte

meowiitten

The standard is "evidence that satisfies the court."

ian 2025-08-18 10:15 p.m.

yea

ian 2025-08-18 10:15 p.m.

still

ian 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.

it's not really admitted

T4K3N 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.

Why is npv throwing ts

singhski 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.

Okay,

@meowiitten

@ian

1. I will review the evidence tomorrow.
2. Redneck is not going to be held in contempt as of now.
3. Luhv can represent Ax1t without filing a substitution.

Singhski

Okay, @meowiitten @ian 1. I will review the evidence tomorrow. 2. Redneck is not going to be held in contempt as of now. 3. Luhv can represent Ax1t w...

T4K3N 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.

Yo what’s good

ian 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.

I also need to know if I can set aside default

T4K3N 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.

How are you today

ian 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.

if you allow me to withdraw from everything except county

ian 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.

and I need the ex parte from tactical

ian 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.

if he does dm you

ian

if you allow me to withdraw from everything except county

singhski 2025-08-18 10:17 p.m.

Well you wouldn’t be representing everyone else in that situation

singhski 2025-08-18 10:18 p.m.

so your motion would only set aside default for the entity you are representing

Singhski

Okay, @meowiitten @ian 1. I will review the evidence tomorrow. 2. Redneck is not going to be held in contempt as of now. 3. Luhv can represent Ax1t w...

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:18 p.m.

Can I just show you the video again and then list off damages for each count that we seek

singhski 2025-08-18 10:19 p.m.

EX PARTE DISCLOSURE

meowiitten

Can I just show you the video again and then list off damages for each count that we seek

singhski 2025-08-18 10:22 p.m.

Sure.

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:22 p.m.

OK.

singhski 2025-08-18 10:23 p.m.

@meowiitten

Can you actually edit the video to list off damages for each count you seek

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:23 p.m.

I'll just do time stamp

singhski 2025-08-18 10:23 p.m.

kind of like those how many crimes did Walter White commit in Breaking Bad type videos

Singhski

Okay, @meowiitten @ian 1. I will review the evidence tomorrow. 2. Redneck is not going to be held in contempt as of now. 3. Luhv can represent Ax1t w...

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:34 p.m.

@Kenzie

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:42 p.m.

So do I pay 600k total

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:42 p.m.

@meowiitten

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:43 p.m.

Can you not clog the chat buddy

DevAX1T

So do I pay 600k total

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:43 p.m.

No so how it works is

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:43 p.m.

Anyone can pay the share

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:43 p.m.

Like as long as it all adds up to the amount awarded

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:43 p.m.

It’s all on you @redneck

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:44 p.m.

Half of it

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:44 p.m.

If 1 million is awarded and one defendant has more money than you they can basically pay it for you

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:44 p.m.

I am merely joking

meowiitten

If 1 million is awarded and one defendant has more money than you they can basically pay it for you

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:44 p.m.

meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:45 p.m.

DISMISSED: Counts 1, 2, 7 (as to Defendant Agents), 8 (as to Defendant Agents), 9, and 10
REMAINING: Counts 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Count 3: Failure to Intervene, Investigate, and Protect from Attack
Against: Defendants SudFortia and djnisnn
Maximum Punitive Damages Exposure: (No Cap)

Request (Compensatory): $400,000

Count 4: Monell Liability
Against: Defendant City of Mersea
Maximum Punitive Damages Exposure: (No Cap)

Request (Compensatory): $0 (No Treasury)

Declaratory Relief?: Yes

Count 5: Negligent Hiring, Training, and Supervision
Against: Defendants DevAX1T and MPD
Maximum Punitive Damages Exposure: $400,000

Compensatory: $200,000

Count 6: Negligent Hiring, Training, and Supervision
Against: Defendants T4K3Nw and MBI
Maximum Punitive Damages Exposure: $400,000

Compensatory: $200,000

Count 7: Negligence
Against: Defendants SudFortia and djnisnn
Maximum Punitive Damages Exposure: $500,000

Compensatory: $250,000

Count 8: Negligence Per Se
Against: Defendants SudFortia and djnisnn
Maximum Punitive Damages Exposure: $675,000

Compensatory: $325,000

Subtotal Compensatory = $1,375,000

Subtotal Punitive (if capped maximums used for 5–8) = $1,975,000

Grand Total = $3,350,000

VIDEO TIMESTAMPS (bolded when including live defendants):
Collision #1: 0:01 - 0:09 (Counts 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10)
Collision #2: 0:10 - 0:15 (Counts 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10)
Collision #3 (repeats twice): 0:15 - 1:40-ish (Counts 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10)
Collision #4: 1:42 - 1:49 (Counts 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10)
Collision #5 1:55 - 2:01 (Counts 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10)
Overarching Counts (the "moving forces" behind what occurred - failure to train, supervise, etc.): Counts 4, 5, 6

@singhski

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:47 p.m.

Interesting

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:47 p.m.

Interesting like the breakdown you provided

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:47 p.m.

It helps me comprehend the brainfuck that I just experienced

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:47 p.m.

So how long have you been a lawyer @meowiitten

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:48 p.m.

I’m not sure how long but surely a decent bit of time

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:49 p.m.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1268044284687552568/1281444206879051868/togif.gif

DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:47 p.m.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1323423476698189875/1356405613642649651/togif.gif

Singhski

so your motion would only set aside default for the entity you are representing

ian 2025-08-19 12:32 a.m.

Yes

Singhski

EX PARTE DISCLOSURE

ian 2025-08-19 12:33 a.m.

Uhm

ian 2025-08-19 12:33 a.m.

Given it's the county's government that is being sued and MPD is an arm of the township

ian 2025-08-19 12:33 a.m.

I don't really think I need consent

ian 2025-08-19 12:34 a.m.

Regardless I did ask for it and I received a response from redneck

ian 2025-08-19 12:34 a.m.

I'm not sure if he's DMing you so that I don't see it and don't get to respond? Or like

ian 2025-08-19 12:34 a.m.

But I did ask him

ian 2025-08-19 12:34 a.m.

He said yes

ian 2025-08-19 12:35 a.m.

I think he is trying to pull some sort of ragebait or prolonging of the proceedings because he is not fond of bob and the rest of DA(edited)

ian 2025-08-19 12:35 a.m.

Which I have to say is deeply unfortunate because I literally had nothing but the greatest intentions here to help MPD, I was not doing anything political

ian 2025-08-19 12:36 a.m.

ian 2025-08-19 12:37 a.m.

Again I'd move for redneck to be held in contempt for deliberately making false representations to the court, alongside what I mentioned originally

redneck 2025-08-19 10:20 a.m.

I'm not going to lie I forgot I said that

redneck 2025-08-19 10:39 a.m.

Your honor, I apologize. I forgot that he dmed me about the matter and I agreed as he was bugging me about it

redneck 2025-08-19 10:39 a.m.

I don't like either that he keeps saying i'm "Not fond of bob and the DA" which isn't true at all. I have 0 issues with bob and think he's a great guy

redneck 2025-08-19 10:40 a.m.

I just think that the county government was setup poorly and a lot of it illegally which there are already past rulings on.

redneck

I just think that the county government was setup poorly and a lot of it illegally which there are already past rulings on.

ian 2025-08-19 11:53 a.m.

MPD is part of the county government

ian 2025-08-19 11:54 a.m.

You're referring to the county board / legislature part of the county government, which yes, was set up illegally

ian 2025-08-19 11:54 a.m.

But I work for the DA's office

ian 2025-08-19 11:55 a.m.

Even if I didn't that doesn't mean you can add the plaintiff, the judge, and 10 other random people to a privileged group chat

meowiitten

DISMISSED: Counts 1, 2, 7 (as to Defendant Agents), 8 (as to Defendant Agents), 9, and 10 REMAINING: Counts 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Count 3: Failure to Intervene, Investigate, and Protec...

meowiitten 2025-08-19 11:56 a.m.

@singhski

meowiitten 2025-08-19 01:47 p.m.

@singhski

-starts getting angry-

ian

Even if I didn't that doesn't mean you can add the plaintiff, the judge, and 10 other random people to a privileged group chat

redneck 2025-08-19 08:08 p.m.

I added the people I was told to add

redneck

I added the people I was told to add

ian 2025-08-19 08:21 p.m.

Who told you to add them

redneck 2025-08-19 08:39 p.m.

My superior

redneck

My superior

ian 2025-08-19 08:39 p.m.

are you not the head of MPD

ian 2025-08-19 08:39 p.m.

what superior could you possibly have

redneck 2025-08-19 10:19 p.m.

Theres people above me?

redneck

Theres people above me?

ian 2025-08-19 10:25 p.m.

No not really, no

ian 2025-08-19 10:25 p.m.

..?

redneck 2025-08-19 10:37 p.m.

There is

ian 2025-08-19 11:14 p.m.

Actually maybe

ian 2025-08-19 11:14 p.m.

ian

Actually maybe

redneck 2025-08-20 12:48 a.m.

I'm not going to lie I had no intentions of causing issues

redneck 2025-08-20 12:48 a.m.

I wasn't expecting them to do that

ian 2025-08-21 10:33 p.m.

@singhski

we agreed I could move to set aside

ian 2025-08-21 10:33 p.m.

ian 2025-08-21 10:34 p.m.

Or no

ian 2025-08-22 05:03 p.m.

@singhski

two things

ian 2025-08-22 05:03 p.m.

one can I move to set aside

ian 2025-08-22 05:03 p.m.

two plaintiff has no counsel

ian 2025-08-22 05:03 p.m.

bc sado is now a judge, again

meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:08 p.m.

I am still here

meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:08 p.m.

He has counsel

ian 2025-08-22 05:18 p.m.

who

ian

who

meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:22 p.m.

Me?

meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:22 p.m.

I'm not commissioned yet

meowiitten

I'm not commissioned yet

ian 2025-08-22 05:27 p.m.

whatr

ian

whatr

meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:27 p.m.

To be commissioned I have to be sworn in and accept the commission

meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:27 p.m.

Otherwise it would be violating my 13th amendment right

ian 2025-08-22 05:28 p.m.

right yes because that abolished involuntary servitude

ian 2025-08-22 05:28 p.m.

a decision I do not agree with

meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:28 p.m.

And the Peonage Act of 1867

meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:28 p.m.

As well as the Ku Klux Klan Act

ian 2025-08-22 05:56 p.m.

Don't forget about the Legalize Being Racist and Sleeping With Children as an Adult Act

ian 2025-08-22 05:56 p.m.

That's my favorite one

ian 2025-08-22 05:58 p.m.

LBRASWCAAA Act of 1789

ian 2025-08-22 05:58 p.m.

Same year as Hamilton being secretary of the the treasury and Jefferson coming back from France

ian 2025-08-22 05:58 p.m.

I know that from the musical

Toby 2025-08-22 08:14 p.m.

Silence.

ian 2025-08-22 08:15 p.m.

What how

ian 2025-08-23 05:10 p.m.

@singhski

pls pls pls pls pls

ian 2025-08-23 05:10 p.m.

Can I move to set aside rn

ian

Can I move to set aside rn

Toby 2025-08-23 07:27 p.m.

Set what aside

Toby

Set what aside

ian 2025-08-23 07:31 p.m.

bro how can you talk here

ian 2025-08-23 07:31 p.m.

The default

ian

The default

Toby 2025-08-23 07:32 p.m.

On what grounds

Toby

On what grounds

ian 2025-08-23 07:36 p.m.

BRO

ian 2025-08-23 07:37 p.m.

Excusable neglect and mistake

Xerxy used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-08-27 04:22 p.m.

Case Modified

@Xerxy

has added @Ian to the case channel.

Ian 2025-08-27 04:49 p.m.

@singhski

can I move to set aside

Ian 2025-08-27 08:58 p.m.

@singhski

we're kind of stuck in time rn

Ian 2025-08-27 08:58 p.m.

like idk what we're doing

Ian 2025-08-28 07:21 p.m.

@singhski

Ian 2025-08-28 07:21 p.m.

Ian 2025-08-28 07:22 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/indian-rock-bloodywood-indianmetal-rock-dance-gif-26815241

MichaelEllerbee 2025-08-29 12:42 a.m.

singhski 2025-08-29 09:48 a.m.

@Ian

yes you can

singhski 2025-08-29 09:48 a.m.

actually I will probably need to decide damages first(edited)

Singhski

actually I will probably need to decide damages first(edited)

Ian 2025-08-29 02:43 p.m.

Yes that’s why I’m saying

Ian 2025-08-29 02:43 p.m.

Ordinarily I need you to do that first

Ian 2025-08-29 02:44 p.m.

But if you believe my motion to set aside would succeed, then the default damages would be moot

Ian 2025-08-29 02:44 p.m.

So for the purposes of the judicial economy you could grant me leave to move now

Ian 2025-08-29 02:45 p.m.

That’s only for the county-represented defendants, though

Ian 2025-08-29 06:40 p.m.

@singhski

singhski 2025-08-29 06:40 p.m.

@Ian

let me finish this ruling

Singhski

@Ian let me finish this ruling

Ian 2025-08-29 06:44 p.m.

alr

MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-02 04:12 p.m.

MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-07 09:36 p.m.

What next

shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-09-12 10:15 a.m.

@singhski

MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-19 07:52 a.m.

Hello?????

MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-19 07:52 a.m.

It’s been a while.

shah_khaled ᴘᴄ

@singhski

MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-20 12:27 p.m.

Singhski

@Ian let me finish this ruling

MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-21 07:38 p.m.

MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-27 11:52 a.m.

Can someone help me. @𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘦 ♥

krabz 2025-10-05 06:50 p.m.

https://trello.com/c/libnBt4W/803-michaelellerbee-v-city-of-mersea-et-al

MichaelEllerbee v. City of Mersea, et al.

Transitional Case

This case existed prior to courts.clarkcounty.site shutting down. This card has been created to keep a record of the case’s existence; however, it will not be updated with past, present, or future case information.

Labels

Civil, Transitional Case

krabz pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:08 p.m.

MichaelEllerbee 2025-10-10 03:59 p.m.

So what now? @krabz I havent gottena response in this in months(edited)

krabz 2025-10-10 04:37 p.m.

this needs to be reassigned

krabz 2025-10-10 04:37 p.m.

singhsk iisnt judge anyokre

bladevaz 2025-10-10 05:58 p.m.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1277723519656136735/1424597529231753349/togif.gif

actxrz 2025-10-14 12:13 a.m.

@Kezzera

@Xerxy

@krabz

@Your Local Dreamer

pls reassign

krabz 2025-11-07 01:11 p.m.

Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge 40qh, under the supervision of Associate Justice krabzatonin (Ret.). Former District Judge Singhski (Ret.) no longer assigned to the case. (Clerk krabzatonin)

clerkFlow Bot2025-11-07 01:12 p.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Magistrate 40qh.

krabz used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-11-07 01:13 p.m.

Case Modified

@krabz

has added @actxrz to the case channel.

krabz used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-11-07 01:13 p.m.

Case Modified

@krabz

has added @bladevaz to the case channel.

krabz used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-11-07 01:13 p.m.

Case Modified

@krabz

has added @MichaelEllerbee to the case channel.

krabz 2025-11-07 01:14 p.m.

where are we with this @actxrz

@bladevaz

@MichaelEllerbee

krabz 2025-11-09 01:19 p.m.

where are we with this @actxrz

@bladevaz

@MichaelEllerbee

krabz

where are we with this @actxrz

@bladevaz

@MichaelEllerbee

bladevaz 2025-11-10 07:45 p.m.

i withdraw

bladevaz

i withdraw

krabz 2025-11-10 08:18 p.m.

who were you representing

bladevaz 2025-11-11 04:44 a.m.

devax1t

🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-13 02:20 a.m.

With that in mind

🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-13 02:20 a.m.

@actxrz

@MichaelEllerbee

Whats going on with this

🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-14 01:23 a.m.

@actxrz

@MichaelEllerbee

krabz 2025-11-14 09:35 p.m.

bladevaz withdraws from case

krabz used

/remove

clerkFlow Bot2025-11-14 09:35 p.m.

Case Modified

@krabz

has removed @bladevaz from the case channel.

krabz 2025-11-14 09:35 p.m.

@MichaelEllerbee

@actxrz

if there isnt an update we will be dismissing

krabz 2025-11-14 09:35 p.m.

idk what shapepnign

User

Message could not be loaded.

🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-18 04:29 a.m.

@Prothonotary's Office

Archive in a day or two(edited)

🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-18 04:29 a.m.

I would like to see if plaintiff/defendant sees this

🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-18 04:31 a.m.

@MichaelEllerbee

@actxrz

🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️

@Prothonotary's Office Archive in a day or two(edited)

profile 2025-11-18 05:11 a.m.

Isnt it in rulings

profile 2025-11-18 05:11 a.m.

yeah..

profile 2025-11-18 05:11 a.m.

Okay!

profile used

/transcript

clerkFlow Bot2025-11-18 08:53 p.m.

Creating transcript..

clerkFlow Bot2025-11-18 08:54 p.m.

https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1440520463796404286 Successfully created transcript.

🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-12-09 11:58 a.m.

@Prothonotary's Office