guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#michaelellerbee-v-city-of-mersea-et-al
This is the start of #michaelellerbee-v-city-of-mersea-et-al channel.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 12:16 p.m.
New Case
Case Type
civil
Case Number
CV-352-25
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:08 p.m.
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-07-21 12:16 p.m.
@singhski
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-07-21 12:16 p.m.
case-count
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 12:20 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Hon’ble Judge Singhski.
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 01:33 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @MichaelEllerbee to the case channel.
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 01:33 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @meowiitten to the case channel.
singhski
singhski 2025-07-21 01:33 p.m.
@meowiitten if you could reupload everything into this chat first
singhski
singhski 2025-07-21 01:33 p.m.
aswell as for other cases you have on my docket
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-21 01:41 p.m.
singhski
singhski 2025-07-21 02:37 p.m.
Thank you
singhskisinghski used
/summon
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 02:37 p.m.
:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @actxrz(edited)
singhskisinghski used
/summon
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 02:38 p.m.
:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @dero(edited)
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 02:38 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @actxrz to the case channel.
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-21 02:38 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @dero to the case channel.
singhski
singhski 2025-07-21 02:38 p.m.
@actxrz @dero
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-21 02:40 p.m.
great…
dero
dero 2025-07-21 10:40 p.m.
@meowiitten How about we flip a coin
derodero
@meowiitten How about we flip a coin
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-23 05:19 p.m.
Well
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 02:43 p.m.
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT BY THE COURT OR CLERK
@singhski @Xerxy @Nicklaus
Nicklaus
Nicklaus 2025-07-28 02:48 p.m.
Entry of Default
Pursuant to Mayfl. R. Civ. P. 37(a), the Prothonotary's Office hereby enters Defendants’ default in this case.

/s/ Nicklaus_s
Underprothonary
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 06:14 p.m.
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
@singhski
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 06:14 p.m.
DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF MAYFLOWER COUNTY OF CLARK --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X MICHAELELLERBEE, : : Plaintiff, : - agains...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 07:52 p.m.
@singhski Pleaseeeeeeuh
meowiittenmeowiitten
@singhski Pleaseeeeeeuh
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 07:53 p.m.
Put my name on it
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 07:59 p.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 07:59 p.m.
@singhski Can I distribute this
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:00 p.m.
Ah no date
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:00 p.m.
One second
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:00 p.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:00 p.m.
There
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:07 p.m.
DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF MAYFLOWER COUNTY OF CLARK --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X MICHAELELLERBEE, : : Plaintiff, : - agains...
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:11 p.m.
Yes
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-28 08:38 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @T4K3N to the case channel.
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-28 08:39 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @amigo1101 to the case channel.
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:39 p.m.
@T4K3N @amigo1101 Voice your concerns here please.
amigo1101
amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:39 p.m.
Nobody from the courts dmed me
amigo1101
amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:39 p.m.
I was never served
amigo1101
amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:39 p.m.
or made awair of this
meowiittenmeowiitten
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:39 p.m.
Execution of judgment stayed until we resolve the servicing issue these two gentlemen have brought up
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:40 p.m.
Alright
amigo1101
amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:40 p.m.
Only dm I got about this was from sado himself
amigo1101
amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:40 p.m.
and that was just now
amigo1101
amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:40 p.m.
17 minutes ago
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:40 p.m.
Why didn't actxrz or dero contact you?
meowiittenmeowiitten
Alright
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:40 p.m.
because I understand their counsel has engaged with these proceedings, so there is some understanding that they were going to litigate(edited)
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.
They are your lawyers
amigo1101
amigo1101 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.
I dont know
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.
Well that's very bad
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.
Also not sure why the DOJ didn’t bring up this issue
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.
I don't know what to say about that
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.
Yes
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:41 p.m.
these two gentlemen aren’t at fault
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:42 p.m.
If anything we also should have served them
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:42 p.m.
They have a financial interest in the outcome of this case and they were not served
derodero
They have a financial interest in the outcome of this case and they were not served
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:42 p.m.
But I understand we made a mistake, this could have been pointed out earlier?
SinghskiSinghski
But I understand we made a mistake, this could have been pointed out earlier?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:43 p.m.
Yes because now I've had to waste my time as well
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:43 p.m.
I figured they had been served. Opposing counsel has a shack and sleeping bag set up outside the court and files endlessly. We did not have the time to handle this and it slipped my mind
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:43 p.m.
I move to vacate the default judgment your honor and I wish for time to lodge a reply
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:43 p.m.
Are you defending the officers as well
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:43 p.m.
Or just the agencies and city
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:44 p.m.
I will vacate the default judgment if you can file your reply within 48 hours @dero(edited)
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:44 p.m.
I will ask them if t hey want me to defend them as well one moment
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:44 p.m.
Thank you your honor
SinghskiSinghski
I will vacate the default judgment if you can file your reply within 48 hours @dero(edited)
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:44 p.m.
I would only vacate to the officers and individual defendants
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:44 p.m.
MBI, MPD, and City lost their ability to defend and only Dero can rep them
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:44 p.m.
Or act
meowiittenmeowiitten
I would only vacate to the officers and individual defendants
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:45 p.m.
@dero This is also true because the cases brought against the individual defendants were void ab initio because the court lacked personal jurisdiction
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:45 p.m.
Otherwise MBI, MPD and the City have lost their ability to defend
SinghskiSinghski
Otherwise MBI, MPD and the City have lost their ability to defend
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:46 p.m.
@meowiitten If you could draft a new default to reflect this
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:46 p.m.
I would also like to get to the bottom of this because the SGO is supposed to certify whether or not they will rep the individual defendants yet they didn't do anything like that
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-28 08:46 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @redneck to the case channel.
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:47 p.m.
@redneck Chief?
redneck
redneck 2025-07-28 08:47 p.m.
Current Chief
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:47 p.m.
Honestly I disagree. The parties are too conflicted to do it that way
redneck
redneck 2025-07-28 08:47 p.m.
It would've been nice to be alerted when my department is being sued.
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:47 p.m.
All defendants are sued in both individual and official capacity along with the government bodies
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:47 p.m.
I suppose you are here to also raise a servicing issue? You do not have to be alerted because you are not the entity
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:48 p.m.
He was also not the chief at the time of this lawsuit
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:48 p.m.
Well you probably should be alerted by counsel
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:48 p.m.
Was devaxit served
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:48 p.m.
@meowiitten
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 08:48 p.m.
but you wouldn’t be served
redneck
redneck 2025-07-28 08:48 p.m.
We'll the ruling was made when I was Chief, and I wasn't alerted about DevAX1T being served
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:49 p.m.
I mean if this is the case then DOJ needs to pay our costs
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:49 p.m.
Is the individual capacity devaxit going to stay
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:49 p.m.
Because my client paid a lot of money for this case
meowiittenmeowiitten
Because my client paid a lot of money for this case
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:50 p.m.
Then maybe you should have served everyone
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:50 p.m.
I can't serve anyone I'm the plaintiff's counsel
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:50 p.m.
That's unethical
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:50 p.m.
You're suing the individual police knowing that the government can't be shaken down for money like this
meowiittenmeowiitten
I can't serve anyone I'm the plaintiff's counsel
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:50 p.m.
Shouldve ensured it was done I guess
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:50 p.m.
Not our problem just as much as it isnt yours
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:53 p.m.
@dero Were you planning on defending them in their official capacities they were sued in both
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:53 p.m.
And not individual
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:56 p.m.
@singhski What do we do about the money judgment since obviously MPD, City, and MBI don't pay anything
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 08:58 p.m.
@dero ts not fun no more
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:58 p.m.
Are we not putting a hold on that?
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 08:58 p.m.
we should all js resign or sum shit stg
actxrzactxrz
we should all js resign or sum shit stg
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:58 p.m.
Thought about it when i heard about this
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 08:58 p.m.
strike till sados bar is revoked(edited)
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 08:59 p.m.
buddy has 10 records
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 08:59 p.m.
he’s extremely disrespectful in chambers
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 08:59 p.m.
but this entire game is founded on nepotism and corruption
dero
dero 2025-07-28 08:59 p.m.
@singhski Are we gonna put a pin in default for now? i feel like thats the move here because the proceedings seem a little tainted by this service issue
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 08:59 p.m.
and the need for attention
derodero
@singhski Are we gonna put a pin in default for now? i feel like thats the move here because the proceedings seem a little tainted by this service issue
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 08:59 p.m.
Not against the MBI, city, or MPD we just have to figure out the money issue
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:00 p.m.
Did singski ever actually say the default against the city, mbi, or mpd wasnt getting paused
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:00 p.m.
Yes
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:00 p.m.
I remember him saying make an amended motion
SinghskiSinghski
Otherwise MBI, MPD and the City have lost their ability to defend
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:00 p.m.
Here
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.
Okay i want to talk about that then because I feel like I was brushed off in the chaos there
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.
@singhski
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.
Well I mean you were served so what is there to talk about
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.
Truly
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.
I consent to vacating as to the individual defendants
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.
the other service of process issue and the judge saying he doesnt have PJ over the individual defendants
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:01 p.m.
oh
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:02 p.m.
in that case I dont care
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:02 p.m.
Sure
derodero
I will ask them if t hey want me to defend them as well one moment
T4K3N
T4K3N 2025-07-28 09:02 p.m.
Works for me
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:03 p.m.
The other thing is like
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:03 p.m.
Why didn't you go and speak with them about representation
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:03 p.m.
And just do this now
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:03 p.m.
Because its their choice
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:03 p.m.
So for that matter this also complicates it because you'd have to represent him in his official capacity anyway
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:03 p.m.
they come to us if they want representation individually
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:04 p.m.
and they would have if they had been served
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:04 p.m.
Nah you'd have to represent him in his official capacity anyway
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:04 p.m.
Sure and we were served to do that
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:06 p.m.
@singhski What is the course of action
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:08 p.m.
@meowiitten how did you come to the conclusion that these were MBI agents
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:08 p.m.
you dont really say
derodero
@meowiitten how did you come to the conclusion that these were MBI agents
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:09 p.m.
If they're not MBI then we're just going to sue the state of mayflower or you so that someone will pay
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:09 p.m.
Well the first thing we ought to recognize is that at this time this court cannot exercise personal jurisdiction over the individual defendants, i.e the ones that raised this servicing issue and any others
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:09 p.m.
I'm not doing this "you don't know so no one can pay" bs
meowiittenmeowiitten
If they're not MBI then we're just going to sue the state of mayflower or you so that someone will pay
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:09 p.m.
I mean you cant make me pay
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:10 p.m.
Ok this is just not really how it works I mean somebody has to pay
SinghskiSinghski
Well the first thing we ought to recognize is that at this time this court cannot exercise personal jurisdiction over the individual defendants, i.e the ones that raised this servi...
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:10 p.m.
I move to vacate the individual defendants from this action and we can just proceed with the government
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:10 p.m.
However, as to claims arising out of the official capacity, default must be issued because the State has essentially relinquished their ability to defend due to inaction.
SinghskiSinghski
However, as to claims arising out of the official capacity, default must be issued because the State has essentially relinquished their ability to defend due to inaction.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:11 p.m.
Like as to declaratory judgment as to each defendant?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:11 p.m.
Or only the agencies/city
SinghskiSinghski
However, as to claims arising out of the official capacity, default must be issued because the State has essentially relinquished their ability to defend due to inaction.
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:11 p.m.
Totally fine with this
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:11 p.m.
Agencies
derodero
I move to vacate the individual defendants from this action and we can just proceed with the government
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:12 p.m.
?
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:12 p.m.
I want to exclude the individual defendants
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:12 p.m.
from the lawsuit
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:12 p.m.
you said you dont have jurisdiction over them so I think thats fair
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:12 p.m.
We can just serve them properly
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:12 p.m.
i mean then we should restart this case
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:13 p.m.
The issue with this is kind of like if the agencies are liable then dev and t4k3nw are basically therefore liable in some kind of way as final policymakers
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:13 p.m.
As to their respective counts
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:14 p.m.
what are you trying to say
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:14 p.m.
I'm saying that they can't defend the policies
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:14 p.m.
All they can do is mitigate culpability
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:14 p.m.
I mean I want to clarify the vacating defendants thing
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:14 p.m.
because the plaintiff follows the forum of the defendant
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:15 p.m.
if we're going to proceed with defaulting the government but not the individual defendants in the same case then we should just restart
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:15 p.m.
and if not the individual defendants should be dismissed from this proceeding
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:15 p.m.
This isnt some joinder action, its one big thing and this complicates it
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:15 p.m.
If default is entered against the agencies then all they can say is like "yes the court declared that our department created a policy of deliberate indifference but I had nothing to do with it because of X"
derodero
This isnt some joinder action, its one big thing and this complicates it
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.
Ok because you failed to file an answer
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.
That's why
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.
Why should I have to deal with that
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.
If you did file an answer we wouldn't be in this situation
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.
if the court served everyone properly we wouldnt be in this situation either
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.
and even if i did file a reply this would still be an issue
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:16 p.m.
so
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:18 p.m.
No I do recognise the issue because of the entities are defaulted there would be an expectation that the court would be imputing liability to the individual defendants.
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:19 p.m.
Okay which supports both of my claims
SinghskiSinghski
No I do recognise the issue because of the entities are defaulted there would be an expectation that the court would be imputing liability to the individual defendants.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:19 p.m.
Happens a lot more than we realize I'm sure
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:19 p.m.
either we dismiss the individuals and try them under a separate action or we restart completely clean slate
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:19 p.m.
1. I agree to vacating the default as to the individual defendants
2. I do not agree that it is my obligation to serve individual defendants personally
3. I can write an order granting all the relief against the agencies and city and removing the individual defendants
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:19 p.m.
@meowiitten I believe I did read something about this very situation a while ago
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.
and if I remember the authority did side with what Dero is saying
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.
I’m currently outside I will try to find it
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.
wtf ur outside?
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.
thats disgusting
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.
traitor
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.
Act lock in
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 09:20 p.m.
sorry
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 09:21 p.m.
Actxrz for the defendants in their official capacity, your honor.
actxrzactxrz
Actxrz for the defendants in their official capacity, your honor.
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:21 p.m.
Shushhhhhhh
SinghskiSinghski
@meowiitten I believe I did read something about this very situation a while ago
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:21 p.m.
Its Frow v. De La Vega, 82 U.S. 552 (1872)
✅1
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 09:21 p.m.
yoooo singhski
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 09:21 p.m.
u fw kitchari?
✅1
actxrz
actxrz 2025-07-28 09:21 p.m.
or nah
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:22 p.m.
@meowiitten @meowiitten My main concern now is that entering judgment against one party might prejudice with the defenses of the remaining parties. I would defer entering final judgment on the default to circumvent inconsistent judgments or possible due process concerns if that makes sense.
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:23 p.m.
With that being said, I need to know @dero how long would it take you to reply, if we were to start from scratch
SinghskiSinghski
@meowiitten @meowiitten My main concern now is that entering judgment against one party might prejudice with the defenses of the remaining parties. I would defe...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.
The other concern is that we tolerate failing to file an answer
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.
and @meowiitten is there some sort of monetary loss for the plaintiff as the case takes longer?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.
And missing deadlines
SinghskiSinghski
and @meowiitten is there some sort of monetary loss for the plaintiff as the case takes longer?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.
Yes
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:25 p.m.
He pays me 50k every 14 days
meowiittenmeowiitten
He pays me 50k every 14 days
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:26 p.m.
So ~4K daily?
SinghskiSinghski
With that being said, I need to know @dero how long would it take you to reply, if we were to start from scratch
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:26 p.m.
Working on it right now your honor
SinghskiSinghski
So ~4K daily?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:27 p.m.
Something like that
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:31 p.m.
And if possible I'd like to move for $28,571 in costs as a sanction
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:32 p.m.
I can attach billing
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:36 p.m.
Option 1: Hold the agencies and city liable in default in spite of Frow
Option 2: Tolerate the DOJ's neglect, but impose costs of $28,571 as a sanction for their clear failure to defend and wasting Plaintiff's time
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:36 p.m.
meowiittenmeowiitten
Option 1: Hold the agencies and city liable in default in spite of Frow Option 2: Tolerate the DOJ's neglect, but impose costs of $28,571 as a sanction for their clear failure to...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:38 p.m.
@singhski
meowiittenmeowiitten
@singhski
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:40 p.m.
Sybau twin. You want me to charge a late filing fee before the filing.
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:40 p.m.
Cuz that’s what this is basically
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:40 p.m.
Let him file
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:41 p.m.
File what
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:41 p.m.
He didn't file an answer
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:41 p.m.
He is filing soon
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.
Dero & actxrz -> Defends City, MBI, MPD
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.
Dero & actxrz did not defend any of them
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.
Default would have been entered if there were no individual defendants
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.
You mean in that regard for their failure to defend
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.
Yes
singhski
singhski 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.
Send billing
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 09:42 p.m.
Alright
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:48 p.m.
A sanction for failure to defend sounds unheard of in this court especially when it wasnt my completely my fault that we had to restart the proceedings
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:48 p.m.
No reason i should be paying 20k
dero
dero 2025-07-28 09:48 p.m.
Check his heritage
SinghskiSinghski
Send billing
dero
dero 2025-07-28 10:29 p.m.
@meowiitten @singhski
derodero
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-28 10:53 p.m.
Can you let me know if the defendants let you rep them
meowiittenmeowiitten
Can you let me know if the defendants let you rep them
dero
dero 2025-07-29 04:26 a.m.
Taken and auddortia consent
dero
dero 2025-07-29 04:26 a.m.
ill talk to devaxit
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:04 p.m.
Can we add devaxit here btw
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:05 p.m.
he consents to my representation and wants to speak
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:05 p.m.
@singhski
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-29 12:05 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @DevAX1T to the case channel.
derodero
Taken and auddortia consent
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 12:05 p.m.
What about Sud and DJ
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:06 p.m.
@dero now I hope you understand that all of the individual defendants have voluntarily appeared
SinghskiSinghski
@dero now I hope you understand that all of the individual defendants have voluntarily appeared
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.
Yes as long as they all consent theyll have answered under my responsive pleading
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.
Sud and DJ need to be added I think
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.
thats the intention
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.
ill get with djsn
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.
Thank you
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.
But yes sudfortia has consented to me as well
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.
I shouldve decided to stfu so I couldve gotten a mistrial
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:07 p.m.
I regret this
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.
you were going to get served
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.
regardless
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.
when bruh
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.
like right about now
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.
can i make an oral motion @singhski
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.
I don't know, are you representing yourself?
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.
dero is representing me but i also maintain the right to make a pro se motion regardless
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:08 p.m.
do i not
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:09 p.m.
dero is representing me
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:09 p.m.
@Niss
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:09 p.m.
Djnisnn has consented to my representation
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.
Thats all of them
DevAX1TDevAX1T
dero is representing me
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.
Perhaps you should confer with counsel first
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @Niss to the case channel.
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.
@dero dms cuh
SinghskiSinghski
Perhaps you should confer with counsel first
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.
We're good to use my answer as theirs too right
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.
Just clarifying that
derodero
We're good to use my answer as theirs too right
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:10 p.m.
yeah
SinghskiSinghski
yeah
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:11 p.m.
Alright whats the next step your honor. Me and opposing counsel can get together and talk dates and issues then get you a status report
singhskisinghski used
/pretrial
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-29 12:13 p.m.
Pretrial Schedule
Discovery will be taken care of separately during the pretrial period.

Pre-trial motions will be accepted until Wednesday, August 6, 2025 at 12:13 p.m. or 6 months ago.

The pre-trial period will end on Friday, August 8, 2025 at 12:13 p.m. or 6 months ago.
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:13 p.m.
@dero Are you filing a MTD?
SinghskiSinghski
@dero Are you filing a MTD?
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:14 p.m.
Ill do a deeper review with my clients about the facts and ill see if i have any mtd
dero
dero 2025-07-29 12:14 p.m.
Cant confidently answer rn though
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:15 p.m.
ChatGPT advised me to ask if I can be withdrawn in my individual capacity
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-07-29 12:18 p.m.
ChatGPT is saying that refusing to respond to my request in a timely manner, such as within the first minute, is a severe violation of my constitutional rights.
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:40 p.m.
EX PARTE DISCLOSURE
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:40 p.m.
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:40 p.m.
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:41 p.m.
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-07-29 12:41 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @MichaelEllerbee to the case channel.
singhski
singhski 2025-07-29 12:41 p.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 01:25 p.m.
@singhski Are we getting costs or naw
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 01:26 p.m.
The only reason the agencies didn’t default was because of Frow
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 01:26 p.m.
Otherwise they failed to respond
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 06:25 p.m.
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE THE ANSWER AND ENTER DEFAULT
@singhski @dero
dero
dero 2025-07-29 07:03 p.m.
@singhski maybe I can just include the affirmative defenses
dero
dero 2025-07-29 07:04 p.m.
that seems like the most reasonable solution
dero
dero 2025-07-29 07:04 p.m.
this is again another reach
derodero
@singhski maybe I can just include the affirmative defenses
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:06 p.m.
I explain why you can't
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:06 p.m.
And those are also unavailable
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:06 p.m.
And not including them is only half of the motion
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:06 p.m.
It's broken up into quarters on different issues
dero
dero 2025-07-29 07:06 p.m.
I mean you say it wouldnt be in timely fashion but it would be
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.
It's broken up into quarters on different issues
dero
dero 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.
me amending would solve half of your problems raised
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.
That wouldn't resolve the whole thing
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.
No
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.
Only 25%
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.
And I also explain why you can't
dero
dero 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.
No like half your TOC is solved by me amending
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.
You can't
meowiittenmeowiitten
And I also explain why you can't
dero
dero 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.
No you explain why I shouldnt be able to
dero
dero 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.
not why i cant
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.
You can't without my consent or the court's leave(edited)
dero
dero 2025-07-29 07:07 p.m.
Lol okay thanks genius?
dero
dero 2025-07-29 07:08 p.m.
Its possible that I was asking for leave when i asked the court to amend :🤖:
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 07:08 p.m.
Well you waited 8 days to file an answer and now here we are with a blanket general denial with no defenses raised(edited)
dero
dero 2025-07-29 07:08 p.m.
We're crosstalking and we shouldnt I think we should just wait for your honor
dero
dero 2025-07-29 07:08 p.m.
@singhski
meowiittenmeowiitten
You can't without my consent or the court's leave(edited)
AlbertBlackwell
AlbertBlackwell 2025-07-29 07:08 p.m.
Please don’t edit messages
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 09:00 p.m.
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE THE ANSWER AND ENTER DEFAULT
@singhski @dero
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-29 09:00 p.m.
Reposted because of cross talk
singhski
singhski 2025-07-30 06:38 a.m.
@dero Responding?
SinghskiSinghski
@dero Responding?
dero
dero 2025-07-30 07:35 a.m.
I'd like to amend to preserve the judicial economy
dero
dero 2025-07-30 07:36 a.m.
Amending my response would remedy like half the issues in the motion
dero
dero 2025-07-30 07:36 a.m.
and then I would respond to the remaining stuff
singhski
singhski 2025-07-30 07:36 a.m.
How did you forget to add this
dero
dero 2025-07-30 07:37 a.m.
Thats my bad Dr. Singhski PhD ᴋᴄ
dero
dero 2025-07-30 07:38 a.m.
It would take me like five minutes to fix it and would remedy most of the motion
dero
dero 2025-07-30 07:38 a.m.
I feel like its the best option
dero
dero 2025-07-30 07:53 a.m.
@singhski THis is an amended responsive pleading if your honor would accept that
dero
dero 2025-07-30 07:53 a.m.
and I can respond to the remaining issues in the motion
dero
dero 2025-07-30 07:53 a.m.
I APOLOGIZE to your honor for this
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-30 03:24 p.m.
@singhski Of course I object
meowiittenmeowiitten
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE THE ANSWER AND ENTER DEFAULT @singhski <@40...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-30 06:12 p.m.
@singhski THis as w
dero
dero 2025-07-31 08:51 a.m.
@singhski Hey can i know if my amendment is accepted so I can respond appropriately
derodero
@singhski Hey can i know if my amendment is accepted so I can respond appropriately
singhski
singhski 2025-07-31 11:53 a.m.
Accepted
dero
dero 2025-07-31 07:45 p.m.
Tyvm
dero
dero 2025-07-31 11:15 p.m.
@singhski @meowiitten
dero
dero 2025-07-31 11:15 p.m.
Obviously didnt address the moot issues fixed by amending response
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-31 11:48 p.m.
@singhski Do you expect me to respond to that? I mean come on
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-07-31 11:49 p.m.
If you would like a reply nonetheless I will but like
meowiittenmeowiitten
@singhski Do you expect me to respond to that? I mean come on
dero
dero 2025-08-01 08:18 a.m.
..? why would he? its a response to your motion
dero
dero 2025-08-01 08:18 a.m.
nobody expects you to reply to anything
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-01 06:14 p.m.
@singhski Would you like me to do a reply brief or are you ready for whatever
singhski
singhski 2025-08-01 06:15 p.m.
Sure, I don't mind
singhski
singhski 2025-08-01 06:15 p.m.
More to work with
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-01 06:16 p.m.
Ok I’ll just make it short
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-01 06:16 p.m.
Like 3 pages
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-01 08:12 p.m.
PLAINTIFF’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR A JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
@singhski @dero
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-01 08:14 p.m.
Brief Schedule
1. [PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zjQwy7xcyyjNY_KTOVUhy078s_rWeYre/view?usp=sharing)
2. [DEFENDANTS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nTofyjiDtu5qwZtb_QFk8b73_gQITWxD/view?usp=sharing)
3. [PLAINTIFF'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_INZWfMKRjaQRLEpx1s3LgrsT7q1bF8A/view?usp=sharing)
@singhski
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-01 08:17 p.m.
Proposed judgment available upon request
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-01 08:22 p.m.
Cognizable not cognizible in my header for Section I
dero
dero 2025-08-02 04:04 p.m.
blahhh blah blah. All I need to say is that theres still significant factual issues that need to be worked out in this case and judgment on the pleadings isnt appropriate
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-02 04:28 p.m.
"By its very terms, this standard provides that the mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between the parties will not defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for [judgment on the pleadings]; the requirement is that there be no genuine issue of material fact." Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-248 (1986).
meowiittenmeowiitten
Brief Schedule 1. [PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS](<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zjQwy7xcyyjNY_KTOVUhy078s_rWeYre/...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-02 04:28 p.m.
@singhski Please ...
meowiittenmeowiitten
@singhski Please ...
singhski
singhski 2025-08-02 04:34 p.m.
Tomorrow
singhski
singhski 2025-08-03 07:43 a.m.
ruling today
SinghskiSinghski
ruling today
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-03 12:23 p.m.
OK
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-03 04:57 p.m.
@singhski Hi
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-03 10:39 p.m.
@singhski
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.
@meowiitten I'm LOA since I'm leaving the country but
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.
I will try to squeeze out the opinion, if I can't in that time, I will let you know what is going to happen
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.
You can't leave
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.
currently I am granting the MJP so it likely will involve you just affixing my signature
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.
Who told you you could leave Wtf dude
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.
to your proposed judgment
meowiittenmeowiitten
Who told you you could leave Wtf dude
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 01:33 p.m.
My wife is pregnant IRL so
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 01:34 p.m.
You're married ?????????
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 01:34 p.m.
Yep
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 01:34 p.m.
Congratulations
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 01:34 p.m.
happily don't get any ideas
SinghskiSinghski
to your proposed judgment
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 01:51 p.m.
Do you want a proposed judgment with damages and the declaratory relief or a proposed order granting the MJP
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 01:51 p.m.
Is that what you're asking for
SinghskiSinghski
Accepted
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 04:45 p.m.
we won't be accepting it due to undue prejudice to the plaintiff as outlined by counsel
meowiittenmeowiitten
Do you want a proposed judgment with damages and the declaratory relief or a proposed order granting the MJP
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 04:48 p.m.
proposed order granting
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 04:48 p.m.
MJP
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 04:49 p.m.
I will release the opinion on the 10th with further reasoning, I just don't have time to revisit errors and what not
SinghskiSinghski
proposed order granting
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 05:03 p.m.
DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF MAYFLOWER COUNTY OF CLARK --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X MICHAELELLERBEE, : : Plaintiff, : - agains...
SinghskiSinghski
currently I am granting the MJP so it likely will involve you just affixing my signature
dero
dero 2025-08-04 07:22 p.m.
? can you like walk us through that
dero
dero 2025-08-04 07:22 p.m.
like what
derodero
? can you like walk us through that
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 07:46 p.m.
I will walk you and your clients through this, it is awfully simple
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 07:46 p.m.
@T4K3N @DevAX1T Unfortunately, the Attorney General forgot to add affirmative defenses to the response
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 07:46 p.m.
What that means is that any defense you can make have been waived by omission(edited)
SinghskiSinghski
What that means is that any defense you can make have been waived by omission(edited)
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 07:47 p.m.
i.e, you didn't make that defense, thus you cannot rely on it later
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 07:48 p.m.
1. The response was late
2. Amending the response at the point at which it was amended serves only to prejudice the defendant because of what @meowiitten has explained with the legal fees
SinghskiSinghski
@T4K3N @DevAX1T Unfortunately, the Attorney General forgot to add affirmative defenses to the response
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 07:49 p.m.
Moreover, this isn't something that regularly happens, it is COMPLETELY unavoidable, and I'm honestly shocked this has even happened
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 07:51 p.m.
and this really isn't something you can pin on the judiciary because it was your own counsel which failed to do the literal bare minimum
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 07:52 p.m.
So to then scoff at me for rendering a decision is frankly churlish considering where you stand right now
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 07:53 p.m.
I am disappointed with how the DOJ has handled this case.
SinghskiSinghski
My wife is pregnant IRL so
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:10 p.m.
Wtf
DevAX1TDevAX1T
Wtf
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:10 p.m.
(Joke)
SinghskiSinghski
@T4K3N @DevAX1T Unfortunately, the Attorney General forgot to add affirmative defenses to the response
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:10 p.m.
Ok so
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:10 p.m.
Mistrial
DevAX1TDevAX1T
Mistrial
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.
No dude, your attorney didn’t do the bare minimum
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.
you lose the case
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.
I didn’t even pick him
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.
Keep that in mind
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.
I’m being sued individually
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.
Otherwise I’d ignore this
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.
I barely play Clark Cuh
DevAX1TDevAX1T
I’m being sued individually
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.
I never let anyone represent me and I was never contacted to make any sort of argument
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:11 p.m.
@DevAX1T Hey
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.
AG can choose to represent defendants in their individual capacity if there is an interest
meowiittenmeowiitten
@DevAX1T Hey
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.
Can u plz remove me individually
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.
And hi sado
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.
but your attorney didn’t even make that much clear in retrospect
SinghskiSinghski
but your attorney didn’t even make that much clear in retrospect
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.
I don’t have an attorney
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.
The Attorney General is your attorney
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.
I don’t think I let anyone represent me personally
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:12 p.m.
For official duties idc
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.
the AG was making arguments on your behalf
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.
For individual liability I care
SinghskiSinghski
the AG was making arguments on your behalf
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.
I’m being sued both individually and personally
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.
Individually and officially*
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.
and the AG is representing you in both capacities
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.
he can do that
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.
Not in my individual capacity
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.
He can ask
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:13 p.m.
I tell you again, he can do that
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.
AHHH
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.
@meowiitten any chance u can be chill …
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.
gang I don’t know what I can do
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.
What am I saying in cooked
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.
I’m cooked
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.
I’ve read the proposed affirmative defenses
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.
Homie is not gonna remove me individually
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.
they probably would have been meritless anyways
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:14 p.m.
Can I get a tldr of the case
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:15 p.m.
Did he hit someone or something
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:15 p.m.
Copy and paste into ChatGPT
DevAX1TDevAX1T
Can I get a tldr of the case
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:15 p.m.
Like of why the lawsuit exists rn
DevAX1TDevAX1T
Like of why the lawsuit exists rn
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:16 p.m.
meowiittenmeowiitten
Click to see attachment.
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:17 p.m.
Sado be CHIIIL
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:17 p.m.
But fr can I get a proper response
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:17 p.m.
Is there any chance you’ll be kind enough to remove me individually
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:17 p.m.
Homie doing Lego lawsuits to prepare irl yea I agree it’s a great idea
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:18 p.m.
But save me the troubleeee (individually)
T4K3N
T4K3N 2025-08-04 08:20 p.m.
Honestly AX1T caused this
T4K3N
T4K3N 2025-08-04 08:20 p.m.
He told them to do this
T4K3NT4K3N
He told them to do this
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:23 p.m.
To do what
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:23 p.m.
Cuh I didn’t realize this shit existed
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:24 p.m.
I was ready to resign as of recent
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:24 p.m.
@singhski can I add a rep here
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:24 p.m.
Lawyer
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:24 p.m.
Who?
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 08:24 p.m.
@bladevaz
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-04 08:24 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @bladevaz to the case channel.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:25 p.m.
@bladevaz I understand you are AX1T’s personal lawyer?
bladevaz
bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:25 p.m.
Aye
bladevaz
bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:25 p.m.
Salam alaykoum
bladevaz
bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:28 p.m.
Ok
bladevaz
bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:29 p.m.
@singhski The State did not make clear, as your Honor has pointed out, whether they would be defending Mr. Ax1t and Director Taken in their individual capacity. Therefore, any claims made against their official capacity can be still contested—because my client has made it clear to me that they did not consent to representation in their individual capacities by the DOJ.
bladevaz
bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:31 p.m.
Your Honor, I believe this would be a due process violation, as Teken and Ax1t didn’t get a fair chance to represent themself.
bladevaz
bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:31 p.m.
Taken*
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:38 p.m.
@meowiitten @bladevaz I am sympathetic to the fact that perhaps the defendants have been screwed over by the DOJ, especially because the DOJ refused to explain whether they were defending the defendants in their individual capacities, even when prompted by criticism from opposing counsel.
SinghskiSinghski
@meowiitten @bladevaz I am sympathetic to the fact that perhaps the defendants have been screwed over by the DOJ, especially because the DOJ refused to explai...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:38 p.m.
Well that would go to default and not to the crux of the MJP
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:38 p.m.
There's two parts to the motion
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:39 p.m.
The first part is just a JOP like is the Plaintiff entitled to judgment as a matter of law
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:39 p.m.
The second part is should the answer be struck and default re-entereed
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:39 p.m.
Two is an alternative to one
meowiittenmeowiitten
The second part is should the answer be struck and default re-entereed
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:40 p.m.
Couldn’t this fall into the harmless error doctrine?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:40 p.m.
Not because it's analyzing the answer they filed not the court's error
bladevaz
bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:40 p.m.
Your Honor we are prepared to file a Motion to Reconsider
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:41 p.m.
It's motion for reconsideration not to reconsider this isn't parliament boy
bladevaz
bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:41 p.m.
Where’s my reactions perms .
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:42 p.m.
@meowiitten I do think we need to make sure that the consequences of mistakes follow.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:42 p.m.
Currently packing give me a moment
SinghskiSinghski
@meowiitten I do think we need to make sure that the consequences of mistakes follow.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:43 p.m.
If you're sympathetic to the plight of the individual defendants then it's worse that the AG represented to you that he gained the consent of all individual defendants to represent them
meowiittenmeowiitten
If you're sympathetic to the plight of the individual defendants then it's worse that the AG represented to you that he gained the consent of all individual defendants to represent...
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:44 p.m.
Fwd that message here please.
SinghskiSinghski
Fwd that message here please.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:45 p.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:45 p.m.
Also AX1T consented to Dero
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:45 p.m.
He's kinda switching up now
bladevaz
bladevaz 2025-08-04 08:46 p.m.
He had to send his strongest soldier in for the battle.
meowiittenmeowiitten
He's kinda switching up now
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:46 p.m.
@DevAX1T
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:46 p.m.
Though, I’d take that with a grain of salt because the defendants don’t really know what’s going on :😭: :😭:
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:47 p.m.
This only goes to the alternative relief asked for in the motion
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-04 08:48 p.m.
Like if the answer is so insufficient and/or useless that they would've been better off defaulting
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 08:48 p.m.
I understand
SinghskiSinghski
Though, I’d take that with a grain of salt because the defendants don’t really know what’s going on :😭: :😭:
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:05 p.m.
Okay
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:06 p.m.
I disagree with the notion that I can be represented personally without consent
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:06 p.m.
It allows the State to forcibly get me in whatever position they want and deprives me of a right to any competent counsel and due process
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:06 p.m.
However
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:06 p.m.
I did let them rep me
DevAX1TDevAX1T
I disagree with the notion that I can be represented personally without consent
singhski
singhski 2025-08-04 09:07 p.m.
Did you or did you not consent to the AG representing you in your individual capacity?
SinghskiSinghski
Did you or did you not consent to the AG representing you in your individual capacity?
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:07 p.m.
Ok yes but in taking an issue with you saying they can without my consent
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:07 p.m.
Im* not in
SinghskiSinghski
Did you or did you not consent to the AG representing you in your individual capacity?
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:08 p.m.
I forgot lmao
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:08 p.m.
Sorry I don’t play this game
DevAX1TDevAX1T
Sorry I don’t play this game
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:08 p.m.
Saying this genuinely
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:08 p.m.
Not as a remark
DevAX1TDevAX1T
Sorry I don’t play this game
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 09:08 p.m.
As of being removed from chief*
DevAX1TDevAX1T
As of being removed from chief*
bladevaz
bladevaz 2025-08-04 09:17 p.m.
Silence.
SinghskiSinghski
@T4K3N @DevAX1T Unfortunately, the Attorney General forgot to add affirmative defenses to the response
dero
dero 2025-08-04 11:00 p.m.
Girl i amended it and you allowed it...?
dero
dero 2025-08-04 11:01 p.m.
I mean theres no way you just completely forgot that right
dero
dero 2025-08-04 11:02 p.m.
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-04 11:31 p.m.
lol
derodero
Click to see attachment.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-05 09:54 a.m.
Hello if you read what I said after, we aren’t accepting it anymore
singhski
singhski 2025-08-05 09:54 a.m.
Hi guys I forgot the affirmative defenses sorry
singhski
singhski 2025-08-05 09:54 a.m.
I’ll bring it next time
singhski
singhski 2025-08-05 09:56 a.m.
I’m sorry but even putting aside my reasoning, I was wrong in accepting that amendment anyways because of the sheer volume of cases ruling against accepting amendments at this stage.(edited)
SinghskiSinghski
Hello if you read what I said after, we aren’t accepting it anymore
dero
dero 2025-08-05 12:31 p.m.
you didnt say that
dero
dero 2025-08-05 12:31 p.m.
you didnt say anything
dero
dero 2025-08-05 12:31 p.m.
you just ruled and say it now?
dero
dero 2025-08-05 12:31 p.m.
what is this
dero
dero 2025-08-05 12:32 p.m.
this is quite literally the most random and ill reasoned backtrack ive ever seen
dero
dero 2025-08-05 12:34 p.m.
I cant believe youre about to sit here and totally disregard an entire amendment you allowed and then come the ruling claim it to be not a good idea and reverse it
dero
dero 2025-08-05 12:34 p.m.
you just cant do that
dero
dero 2025-08-05 12:39 p.m.
Is this just something youre doing so you can close this case for your vacation because its looking like it
derodero
Is this just something youre doing so you can close this case for your vacation because its looking like it
singhski
singhski 2025-08-05 01:12 p.m.
I’m not sure that makes much sense, given that the pre-trial would conclude well after my return. I don’t like the mental gymnastics going on here.(edited)
SinghskiSinghski
we won't be accepting it due to undue prejudice to the plaintiff as outlined by counsel
singhski
singhski 2025-08-05 01:14 p.m.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-05 01:15 p.m.
As I have said, I am reversing that previous judgment because it is completely wrong. If you want to appeal it, wait until the 10th which is when I will upload the opinion.
derodero
you just cant do that
singhski
singhski 2025-08-05 01:15 p.m.
Cite the authority
singhski
singhski 2025-08-05 01:16 p.m.
I will cite mine:

“Judicial officers are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality.” Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1, Kingley Napley v. Adolobee, No. CV-0068-24, (Mayfl. Dist. Ct. Feb. 19 2025) (citing Zrihem, et al. v. TDark99, 1 Mayfl. ___, ___ (2024) (slip op., at 11) (Cabot, J., dissenting)) (internal quotation marks omitted).
SinghskiSinghski
Click to see attachment.
dero
dero 2025-08-05 01:40 p.m.
he says after 3 submitted pleadings with no ping
SinghskiSinghski
I will cite mine: “Judicial officers are officers of unwavering authority and impartiality.” Minute Order to Hold Defendant in Civil Contempt, at ¶ 1, Kingley Napley v. Adolobee...
dero
dero 2025-08-05 01:56 p.m.
This isnt some catch all you can throw around lol
dero
dero 2025-08-05 01:57 p.m.
it doesnt work like that
dero
dero 2025-08-05 01:57 p.m.
you abused your discretion by doing this and we will be appealing
derodero
you abused your discretion by doing this and we will be appealing
singhski
singhski 2025-08-06 02:14 a.m.
Appeal on the 10th where I will upload my reasoning
singhski
singhski 2025-08-06 02:26 a.m.
. “[G]enerally, if an affirmative defense is not pleaded, it is waived and excluded from the case”. See Sellers v. M.C Floor Crafters, Inc. 842 F.2d 639 (2d Cir. 1988)

Note that this wording, particularly the adjective “excluded” completely denies the Defendant of the PRIVILEGE of assertion affirmative defenses. I reiterate again, this is a privilege, which you have now forfeited—I don’t see why the Plaintiff should now bear the burden of your mistake. You are no longer permitted to enter your affirmative defenses. That is the meaning of being “excluded”.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-06 02:27 a.m.
see also Satchell v. Dilworth, 745 F.2d 781, 784 (2d Cir. 1984); 5 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure Sec. 1278, at 339 (1969). J
singhski
singhski 2025-08-06 02:27 a.m.
“Where an answer has been filed and an affirmative defense has not been pleaded, the defense generally is deemed to have been waived” Hayes v. Payne,523 So. 2d 333, 335 (1987).
SinghskiSinghski
. “[G]enerally, if an affirmative defense is not pleaded, it is waived and excluded from the case”. See Sellers v. M.C Floor Crafters, Inc. 842 F.2d 639 (2d Cir. 1988) Note that...
dero
dero 2025-08-06 05:34 a.m.
focusing on the wrong issue
dero
dero 2025-08-06 05:35 a.m.
you cant withdraw an interlocutory decision without actual good articulable reason or else its an abuse of discretion if a party relies on it
dero
dero 2025-08-06 05:35 a.m.
so yes we will wait for the 10th
derodero
you cant withdraw an interlocutory decision without actual good articulable reason or else its an abuse of discretion if a party relies on it
dero
dero 2025-08-06 05:36 a.m.
and no "i realized it was prejudicial" is not a reason, its a conclusive statement
dero
dero 2025-08-06 05:37 a.m.
youre just trying to make it as convenient as possible for the plaintiff to win and thats a bit unfortunate but i guess we have to deal with that
derodero
you cant withdraw an interlocutory decision without actual good articulable reason or else its an abuse of discretion if a party relies on it
singhski
singhski 2025-08-06 12:44 p.m.
Which is coming? Nothing has been done yet
derodero
focusing on the wrong issue
singhski
singhski 2025-08-06 12:44 p.m.
I disagree, this absolutely concerns Sado’s second option as outlined in his motion
derodero
youre just trying to make it as convenient as possible for the plaintiff to win and thats a bit unfortunate but i guess we have to deal with that
singhski
singhski 2025-08-06 12:48 p.m.
The way I see it is the DOJ is trying to make up for their malfeasance.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-06 12:49 p.m.
@DevAX1T @dero @T4K3N if you could also provide evidence that you agreed to full representation by the Attorney General, that would be great that way we can clear that issue up for @bladevaz
SinghskiSinghski
The way I see it is the DOJ is trying to make up for their malfeasance.
dero
dero 2025-08-06 01:17 p.m.
You have to be rage baiting
dero
dero 2025-08-06 01:17 p.m.
simple error i corrected very quickly with your permission
derodero
simple error i corrected very quickly with your permission
singhski
singhski 2025-08-06 01:19 p.m.
Ok let’s see here, when did you ask for the amendment, how many hours/days after you filed your original reply ?(edited)
SinghskiSinghski
Ok let’s see here, when did you ask for the amendment, how many hours/days after you filed your original reply ?(edited)
dero
dero 2025-08-06 01:54 p.m.
Filed my og response 7/28/2025, Plaintiff counsel raised the issue 7/29/2025, and I submitted an amended response on 7/30/2025
SinghskiSinghski
@DevAX1T @dero @T4K3N if you could also provide evidence that you agreed to full representation by the Attorney General, that would b...
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-06 02:15 p.m.
My word is enough
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-06 02:16 p.m.
I just didn’t remember because I don’t play this game
derodero
Filed my og response 7/28/2025, Plaintiff counsel raised the issue 7/29/2025, and I submitted an amended response on 7/30/2025
singhski
singhski 2025-08-06 03:46 p.m.
Thank you, I appreciate that you sent this without any remarks.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-06 03:48 p.m.
But the fact of the matter is General that our rules of procedure, as well as the Federal Rules of Procedure which we defer to when in doubt favor a waiver of affirmative defenses when not pled.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-06 03:48 p.m.
The FRCP is deafied in our common law
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-11 08:31 a.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @ian to the case channel.
ian
ian 2025-08-11 09:01 a.m.
@singhski Hello your honor
ian
ian 2025-08-11 09:01 a.m.
Where are we at with this case
ianian
@singhski Hello your honor
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-11 11:51 a.m.
Waiting on a written opinion
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-11 11:51 a.m.
Was already decided
meowiittenmeowiitten
Waiting on a written opinion
ian
ian 2025-08-11 11:55 a.m.
on what
ian
ian 2025-08-11 11:55 a.m.
what stage are we at
ianian
on what
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-11 11:56 a.m.
Motion for JOP was granted
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-11 11:56 a.m.
Its pretrial
ian
ian 2025-08-11 11:56 a.m.
Ok, cool
ian
ian 2025-08-11 11:56 a.m.
when is it ending
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-11 11:57 a.m.
Whenever the opinion is out
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-16 02:44 p.m.
@singhski
ian
ian 2025-08-16 08:49 p.m.
@singhski hi
ian
ian 2025-08-16 08:49 p.m.
idk how long we've been waiting
ian
ian 2025-08-16 08:49 p.m.
but
ian
ian 2025-08-16 08:49 p.m.
I just wanted to say hi im ngl
singhski
singhski 2025-08-17 07:42 a.m.
ok today
ian
ian 2025-08-17 10:37 a.m.
Ok
singhski
singhski 2025-08-17 07:29 p.m.
@ian @meowiitten Postponed to early hours tomorrow, I'm sorry, I'm working on it
singhski
singhski 2025-08-17 07:29 p.m.
5 pages so far
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-17 07:30 p.m.
Alright
SinghskiSinghski
5 pages so far
ian
ian 2025-08-17 07:31 p.m.
Holy moly
ian
ian 2025-08-17 07:31 p.m.
What is the ruling even about
singhski
singhski 2025-08-17 07:32 p.m.
I am not pulling an Awesome, promise
meowiittenmeowiitten
Brief Schedule 1. [PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS](<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zjQwy7xcyyjNY_KTOVUhy078s_rWeYre/...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-17 07:33 p.m.
This
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:56 a.m.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:56 a.m.
Cc: @ian @meowiitten
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:11 a.m.
uh oh
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:12 a.m.
ok we await your order your honor @singhski thank you
ianian
ok we await your order your honor @singhski thank you
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:13 a.m.
Order is here
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:13 a.m.
"3. An accompanying Order will issue, setting forth and underlining the terms of this disposition."
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:14 a.m.
@ian
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:15 a.m.
oh my oh my oh my oh my
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:16 a.m.
@singhski I'm a little confused here pardon me
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:16 a.m.
we're in default then
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:16 a.m.
Yes.
SinghskiSinghski
Yes.
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:20 a.m.
What are the damages
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:20 a.m.
We'll have a hearing I presume
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:29 a.m.
I really need to go rogue
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:29 a.m.
I am not fond of you @meowiitten
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:29 a.m.
dev
ianian
dev
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:32 a.m.
Hi
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:32 a.m.
I’m not paying anything lol
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:32 a.m.
dev can you talk in dms
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:32 a.m.
I’ll admit sado is hilarious for suing but I want him to do it more instead of stopping more
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:32 a.m.
No
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:33 a.m.
I’m not actually going rogue
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:33 a.m.
I’m just quitting before I’m indefinitely jailed for failing to comply with a court ruling
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:33 a.m.
I don’t play Clark anyway so it’s not the biggest deal
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:34 a.m.
I’m annoyed singhski allows everything by sado to fly without any checks of his own to ensure ransoms aren’t added to a lawsuit
DevAX1TDevAX1T
I’m annoyed singhski allows everything by sado to fly without any checks of his own to ensure ransoms aren’t added to a lawsuit
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:36 a.m.
You should be annoyed that the DOJ didn't file affirmative defenses
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:36 a.m.
I’m annoyed at everyone
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.
and denied 84 paragraphs
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.
I’m annoyed sado doesn’t sue more
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.
I’m annoyed that idfk if this can even be appealed
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.
also Sado wanted judgment on the pleadings, the default was alternative to that
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.
I’m annoyed that I was added even though I have no personal responsibility in this
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.
He just added people because he could and you’re brown nosing it all
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:37 a.m.
I granted the default because the DOJ didn't file affirmative defenses
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:38 a.m.
dude! tell it to your attorney
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:38 a.m.
You can’t argue that fail to supervise an employee is a personal failure.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:38 a.m.
Sure, should have put it in the defenses
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:38 a.m.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
SinghskiSinghski
dude! tell it to your attorney
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:38 a.m.
I am crashing out
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-18 11:38 a.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @violet ♡ to the case channel.
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.
For a game I don’t even play
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.
Who is that
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.
Court Therapist added. @violet ♡ please speak to Mr. Ax1t in DMs.
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.
Lmaoo
SinghskiSinghski
dude! tell it to your attorney
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.
what am I gonna do
ianian
what am I gonna do
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.
this is not your fault
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:39 a.m.
I know I wasn't even here
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.
The best thing is to appeal to SC but idk if u can
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.
I’m thinking of default judgement where SC won’t touch that
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.
appeal what
ianian
appeal what
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.
What do you think Cuh
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.
like this is literally how it goes
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.
The case
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.
procedure was followed to the letter here from what Im seeing
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.
this is what happens when a counsel doesn't do the things he's supposed to
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.
Can I not argue my attorney was incompetent or something
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.
we can't appeal to SC and say sorries we're better now
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:40 a.m.
Give civil trials a right to a fair trial too fr
DevAX1TDevAX1T
Can I not argue my attorney was incompetent or something
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.
lowk
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.
Anyway
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.
hm
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.
I do wish I was an internet criminal so I can take petty actions as a result of this
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.
we can set aside default judgment but Im not sure if that applies
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.
ill have to read a bit
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.
but you should talk in the gc
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:41 a.m.
Yes, we will have a hearing @ian @meowiitten .
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:42 a.m.
I’m going to now lose my fucking mind at my mom who woke me up early and continues to sabotage my alertness for my job
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 11:42 a.m.
Kill meeeeeeeeeeee
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:42 a.m.
@singhski can I ask
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:42 a.m.
@violet ♡ Ms Violet please.
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:42 a.m.
what "rule 1.540(b)" is
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.
Where
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.
uhm??
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.
rule 37
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.
LOL what
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.
they forgot to change it when copying and pasting from FRCP probably(edited)
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.
LOL
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:43 a.m.
Ill check there
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:44 a.m.
"(c) Setting Aside a Default or a Default Judgment. The court may set aside an entry of default for good cause, and it may set aside a final default judgment under Rule 60(b)."
ianian
Click to see attachment.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:44 a.m.
It’s Florida rule
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:44 a.m.
so the standard is just good cause
meowiittenmeowiitten
It’s Florida rule
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:44 a.m.
how do you know every state's laws dude
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:44 a.m.
ok Ill check
SinghskiSinghski
Yes, we will have a hearing @ian @meowiitten .
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:45 a.m.
On damages for default?
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 11:45 a.m.
Yes
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:45 a.m.
Alright
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:46 a.m.
Let me get the video and then I’ll do timestamps to break up and explain each incident
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:46 a.m.
ok so it's just
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:46 a.m.
59(e)
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:46 a.m.
but Florida counterpart
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:47 a.m.
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:48 a.m.
@singhski Would this court entertain a motion to set aside as if the order entering default was final, or would we have to wait until after the hearing
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:48 a.m.
Because this only applies to final orders
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:48 a.m.
I made fraud on the court I’m ngl so
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:48 a.m.
You can do that
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:48 a.m.
Pro se MTD for fraud on the court
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:48 a.m.
it's not fraud
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:49 a.m.
unless I raise it later
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:49 a.m.
it's most likely going to be rule (b)(1)
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:49 a.m.
I’m saying I did fraud
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:50 a.m.
what
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:50 a.m.
why would you say that
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:50 a.m.
That’s none of your business
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:52 a.m.
@singhski
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:53 a.m.
The complaint follows this video basically step by step
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:55 a.m.
Also as to evidence that they were state agents (1) look at the DOJ leaderboard, (2) you can guy with a “police” vest on in the passenger seat at 0:02, (3) the MBI denied the FOIA request to identify the agents because it would “give up the confidentiality of an operation” or something like that
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:55 a.m.
And they’re police vehicles
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:55 a.m.
And an MPD officer later said they were MBI agents
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:55 a.m.
Anyways
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:55 a.m.
That’s enough circumstantial evidence
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:56 a.m.
The video itself just shows the facts of the complaint
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 11:57 a.m.
Regardless they are not private persons and that’s all that matters here
meowiittenmeowiitten
@singhski
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:58 a.m.
oh my
ian
ian 2025-08-18 11:58 a.m.
I hate dero for not letting me try this
meowiittenmeowiitten
Also as to evidence that they were state agents (1) look at the DOJ leaderboard, (2) you can guy with a “police” vest on in the passenger seat at 0:02, (3) the MBI denied the FOIA ...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:00 p.m.
Also they already admitted all this stuff by default so
meowiittenmeowiitten
I’m saying I did fraud
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:07 p.m.
Chat is sado a homie
meowiittenmeowiitten
Also they already admitted all this stuff by default so
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:08 p.m.
it's a lawsuit against the government so the bar is a bit higher
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:08 p.m.
you still have to show somewhat that it happened
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:08 p.m.
not the same standard at trial but it's also not admitted automatically
ianian
@singhski Would this court entertain a motion to set aside as if the order entering default was final, or would we have to wait until after the hearing
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:08 p.m.
@singhski
ianian
not the same standard at trial but it's also not admitted automatically
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 12:09 p.m.
True but the point of trial is so that it’s not admitted automatically. By waiving defenses you don’t get that opportunity.
ianian
@singhski Would this court entertain a motion to set aside as if the order entering default was final, or would we have to wait until after the hearing
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 12:09 p.m.
On what basis?
SinghskiSinghski
True but the point of trial is so that it’s not admitted automatically. By waiving defenses you don’t get that opportunity.
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:09 p.m.
if this shit works
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:09 p.m.
can i blatantly sue people who arent involved at all
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:09 p.m.
and hope they dont make an affirmative defense
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:09 p.m.
if so im gonna fucking do that until the game dies thats awesome
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.
No because this never happens
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.
ok well it IS Happening
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.
To me Cuh
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.
:(
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.
he is suing mpd for something mbi did
SinghskiSinghski
On what basis?
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.
mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect
SinghskiSinghski
True but the point of trial is so that it’s not admitted automatically. By waiving defenses you don’t get that opportunity.
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:10 p.m.
you kinda do as the government though
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:11 p.m.
you dont get the same opportunity admittedly
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:11 p.m.
but you get one
meowiittenmeowiitten
I made fraud on the court I’m ngl so
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:11 p.m.
was this fraud specifically pertaining to adding me/mpd to the lawsuit
SinghskiSinghski
No because this never happens
DevAX1TDevAX1T
can i blatantly sue people who arent involved at all
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:12 p.m.
yeah but if the court finds out youre in contempt and for future cases you need to submit an affidavit saying its not frivolous
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:12 p.m.
im not sure if the affidavit thing is here too
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:12 p.m.
he is literally suing us for mbi did
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:12 p.m.
how does he have standing :😭:
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:13 p.m.
he got default
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:14 p.m.
iif theres no standing the court cant act
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:15 p.m.
the court cant exercise jurisdiction in that circumstance
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 12:15 p.m.
Everything you are saying should have been plead as affirmative defenses.
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:15 p.m.
the court has to satisfy of itself jurisdiction sua sponte
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:16 p.m.
its a reverseable error not to
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:16 p.m.
i cannot sue the country of britain in new york and get default judgement
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:16 p.m.
if so im gonna fuckin do that
DevAX1TDevAX1T
he is literally suing us for mbi did
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.
The actual theory is that your officers failed to intervene because of supervisory negligence + deliberate indifference (by the city) which included refusing to discipline officers who had instances of misconduct in the past
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.
And it was the moving force as we allege
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.
However you admit to all of this by default
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.
there is no duty to intervene by LE
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.
where did you get that from
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.
No way?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:17 p.m.
Lol
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:18 p.m.
theres no constitutional duty*
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:18 p.m.
but something tell sme you did not argue that
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:18 p.m.
Well you’re going to learn pretty quickly that there is
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:18 p.m.
ax1t
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:18 p.m.
pls
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:18 p.m.
what case @meowiitten
ianian
pls
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:19 p.m.
No im a good lawyer for a moment trust
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:19 p.m.
Only for a moment though
DevAX1TDevAX1T
No im a good lawyer for a moment trust
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:19 p.m.
You mean chatgpt is a good lawyer
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:20 p.m.
standing is not a jurisdictional defect, it's a merits one
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:20 p.m.
if not raised it's waived
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:20 p.m.
unlike suing the country of britain in new york
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:20 p.m.
because sovereign immunity IS a jurisdictional defect
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:20 p.m.
soverign immunity doesnt apply to an external country
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:20 p.m.
i did not spell sovereign right
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:21 p.m.
uhm
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:21 p.m.
when was standing a merits issue
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:21 p.m.
can u please talk to me in dms
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:21 p.m.
no
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:21 p.m.
wait lowk standing might be jurisdictional
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.
:🤔:
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.
bc of art iii
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.
cuh
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.
lmaoo
ianian
wait lowk standing might be jurisdictional
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.
it is
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.
scotus said jurisdiction CANNOt be waived
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.
ok we will address that
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.
pls
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.
even if both parties agree
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.
dms :🙏:
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:22 p.m.
This courtroom is my therapy
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:23 p.m.
If you wanna say a city and police department can’t be sued be my guest
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:23 p.m.
And police chief
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:23 p.m.
oh no they can
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:23 p.m.
absolutely
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
but u cant sue for police not intervening
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
what case do u have
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
Bro
meowiittenmeowiitten
If you wanna say a city and police department can’t be sued be my guest
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
it's a township actually
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
so of the county
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
sir
meowiittenmeowiitten
Bro
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
its a simple question
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
it's still a lesser head for the purpose of SI tho but
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
yea
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
u already admitted to fraud tahts enough to get a mistrial
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
it is not enough nvm
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
mistrial
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
what
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
IGNORE THAT @ian
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
We didnt even get a mistrial
DevAX1TDevAX1T
but u cant sue for police not intervening
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
@ian Do you want me to explain it to him or do you want to(edited)
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
dev please
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
he doesnt listen to me
meowiittenmeowiitten
@ian Do you want me to explain it to him or do you want to(edited)
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
npz just said that standing can be waived
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:24 p.m.
how about u explain it
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.
Ok buddy
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.
youre getting a free lawyer I would not push it
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.
UR CHILL i just want to know what sado is thinking @ian
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.
sorry sorry
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.
im crashing out idk what to do
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.
just wait for us to set aside default n stuff
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.
this comes after some cunt made me change my email because they spammed it with mailinglists
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.
"It is widely recognized that all law enforcement officials have an affirmative duty to intervene to protect the constitutional rights of citizens from infringement by other law enforcement officers in their presence." Anderson v. Branen, 17 F.3d 552, 557 (2d Cir. 1994).
DevAX1TDevAX1T
this comes after some cunt made me change my email because they spammed it with mailinglists
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.
LMAO THIS HAPPENED TO ME
meowiittenmeowiitten
"It is widely recognized that all law enforcement officials have an affirmative duty to intervene to protect the constitutional rights of citizens from infringement by other law en...
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.
thats not binding
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:25 p.m.
I gave orange my email
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:26 p.m.
suddenly I have 2500 daily notifications from Reddit
DevAX1TDevAX1T
thats not binding
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:26 p.m.
:🤯::🤯::🤯:
DevAX1TDevAX1T
thats not binding
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:26 p.m.
PLEASE
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:26 p.m.
please.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:28 p.m.
@singhski Are you satisfied with the evidence do you want me to make an order
meowiittenmeowiitten
@singhski Are you satisfied with the evidence do you want me to make an order
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 12:29 p.m.
Well, all of the evidence will be taken into consideration at the hearing.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 12:30 p.m.
what is the order for?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:30 p.m.
Oh I didn’t know you wanted an actual hearing
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:30 p.m.
Usually they just ask me for evidence
SinghskiSinghski
Well, all of the evidence will be taken into consideration at the hearing.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:31 p.m.
When would this hearing be and I assume that the government will not be present
meowiittenmeowiitten
When would this hearing be and I assume that the government will not be present
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 12:36 p.m.
The government is entitled to notice and can appear at the hearing(edited)
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:37 p.m.
Okay so when is it
meowiittenmeowiitten
Okay so when is it
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 12:38 p.m.
How about in 20-30 minutes? @ian
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 12:38 p.m.
I can vc then, npz doesn't have to
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 12:39 p.m.
Ah I can’t really vc but I can type
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 12:40 p.m.
Sure, I mean we can conduct it asynchronously
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:42 p.m.
I cant vc either @singhski
ian
ian 2025-08-18 12:42 p.m.
but asynchronously is good
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 01:05 p.m.
@singhski I’m ready
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 01:12 p.m.
@singhski
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 01:12 p.m.
plz add @Kenzie
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 01:12 p.m.
she is counsel
DevAX1TDevAX1T
plz add @Kenzie
ianian
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 01:15 p.m.
You letting him disrespect you
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 01:15 p.m.
Like that
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 03:22 p.m.
@singhski
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-18 03:22 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @Kenzie to the case channel.
ian
ian 2025-08-18 03:56 p.m.
@singhski luhv needs to file a request for substitution of counsel if she wants to appear
ian
ian 2025-08-18 03:56 p.m.
Ive informed her of such
ian
ian 2025-08-18 03:56 p.m.
a notice of appearance is not due where the party is already represented in the record
ianian
@singhski luhv needs to file a request for substitution of counsel if she wants to appear
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 04:59 p.m.
I can have multiple lawyers
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 04:59 p.m.
I do ask the court to remove @bladevaz and @ian as my individual counsel and let @Kenzie represent me individually
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:00 p.m.
@singhski
DevAX1TDevAX1T
I do ask the court to remove @bladevaz and @ian as my individual counsel and let @Kenzie represent me individually
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:01 p.m.
your new attorney needs to file a request for substitution of counsel, like I already told her and like I said here
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:01 p.m.
and I represent the rest of the defendants anyway so Im not going to be removed ?
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:01 p.m.
@Kenzie
ianian
your new attorney needs to file a request for substitution of counsel, like I already told her and like I said here
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:02 p.m.
I don’t believe so
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:02 p.m.
Also the county should still be representing me officially
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:02 p.m.
I’m not messing with anything in my official capacity. As far as I care the city can burn RAHHH
DevAX1TDevAX1T
I don’t believe so
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:02 p.m.
okay
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.
uhm they do
ianian
uhm they do
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.
Where
DevAX1TDevAX1T
Also the county should still be representing me officially
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.
you're not sued officially
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.
I am
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.
no
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.
I’m sued in both capacities
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.
you're sued for negligent hiring which is an individual capacity tort
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.
no
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.
you're not sued in your official capacity
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.
I explained this to your attorney
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.
please communicate with your attorney
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:03 p.m.
I am sensing here a continued lack of communicating with whoever your attorney is
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:04 p.m.
please communicate with your attorney and sort this out with her
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:04 p.m.
she needs to file a request for substitution of counsel
DevAX1TDevAX1T
Where
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:04 p.m.
Here
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:04 p.m.
this is the case
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:04 p.m.
?
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:08 p.m.
Cuh
ianian
you're sued for negligent hiring which is an individual capacity tort
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:08 p.m.
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:08 p.m.
Literally both capacities
DevAX1TDevAX1T
Click to see attachment.
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:08 p.m.
should I even keep talking to you at this point
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:08 p.m.
scroll down
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:08 p.m.
the only torts you are named in is negligent hiring which is individual capacity
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:09 p.m.
Stll listed
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:09 p.m.
Still listed
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:09 p.m.
doesn't matter
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:09 p.m.
it's wrong then
ianian
it's wrong then
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 05:09 p.m.
Yes but the judge won’t care
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:10 p.m.
what exactly do you want me to defend on your behalf
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:10 p.m.
for your official capacity
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:10 p.m.
you want me to appear on your behalf to defend nothing?
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:10 p.m.
Please let your attorney file her request for substitution
ian
ian 2025-08-18 05:10 p.m.
and go through her
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:49 p.m.
@singhski
SinghskiSinghski
what is the order for?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:49 p.m.
Order would just be a proposed order for default judgment like listing the actual damages
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:49 p.m.
But
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:49 p.m.
We didn't do the hearing you wante
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:49 p.m.
Tbh @ian if you wanna move to vacate just do it now in writing
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:50 p.m.
And that way singhski can just look at the evidence
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:51 p.m.
@singhski Im having issues with the defendants
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:52 p.m.
apparently some of them want to get new lawyers or idk what's happening
meowiittenmeowiitten
@singhski
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:52 p.m.
Could u be kind and remove me individually
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:52 p.m.
Plz
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:52 p.m.
King sado
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:52 p.m.
(I am a suckup rn)
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.
oK
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.
@singhski I just saw the group chat
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.
Uhm. yea
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.
I was added to a gc called Michaelelerbee v. MPD, before I could disclose ex parte comms I was removed.
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.
I will be respectfully withdrawing as counsel for all individual capacities in this case due to the obvious
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.
conflict of interest
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.
that has arisen
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.
Yo wtf 16mil LMAOO
SinghskiSinghski
I was added to a gc called Michaelelerbee v. MPD, before I could disclose ex parte comms I was removed.
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.
can't disclose that
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.
it's privilege
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:53 p.m.
a lot of it is privileged
ianian
can't disclose that
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.
Just the part where I spoke
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.
ok Ill send
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.
dude that was not privileged…method 1 was not…
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.
SinghskiSinghski
dude that was not privileged…method 1 was not…
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.
it's
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.
yes it's privileged
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:54 p.m.
scrolling up half a second shows the privileged info
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:55 p.m.
can I have you hold tactical in contempt @singhski
ianian
can I have you hold tactical in contempt @singhski
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:55 p.m.
For what
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 09:55 p.m.
Thought it was a troll gc after I saw method 1
SinghskiSinghski
Thought it was a troll gc after I saw method 1
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:55 p.m.
what's method 1
ianian
can I have you hold tactical in contempt @singhski
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 09:55 p.m.
don’t you represent him
SinghskiSinghski
Thought it was a troll gc after I saw method 1
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:56 p.m.
I also saw it
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:56 p.m.
.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 09:56 p.m.
Method 1. Those who know.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:56 p.m.
What's method 2
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 09:56 p.m.
I don’t think
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.
Its ok I waive ex parte because I am aware of um
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.
Well
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.
You know
SinghskiSinghski
don’t you represent him
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.
No
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.
Method 1?
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.
I represent the MPD
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.
as an extension of the county government
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.
(it's the police department of the township)
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.
(townships are part of counties)
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.
he was just in because he's the current chief
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:57 p.m.
this raises serious concerns though
SinghskiSinghski
Method 1. Those who know.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.
Alright well I would like to do this hearing man ...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.
Man ...
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.
I can’t after I just saw method 1.
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.
Man 16mil for this is
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.
Insane
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.
no seriously this is like
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.
Bro what
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.
Is method 1
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.
what is that
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:58 p.m.
What are you talking about your honor
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.
ok so here's what happened @singhski
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.
I think sing and sado are messing around in dms
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.
1. many parties
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.
2. we have GC
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.
3. MPD is party, so their rep redneck is added
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.
4. redneck says he doesnt want me representing him and adds his counsel
ian
ian 2025-08-18 09:59 p.m.
5. privileged conversations
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.
6. redneck goes rogue and adds the plaintiff?? and a bunch of other people that start spamming the gc (and you)
DevAX1TDevAX1T
I think sing and sado are messing around in dms
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.
Npz can say that was not the case
meowiittenmeowiitten
Npz can say that was not the case
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.
Idk
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.
I just don’t want to pay sixteen million
meowiittenmeowiitten
Npz can say that was not the case
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.
Nope Npz eyes were not blessed by method 1.
ianian
6. redneck goes rogue and adds the plaintiff?? and a bunch of other people that start spamming the gc (and you)
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.
@singhski Ill really need him in contempt
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.
but SOMEONE
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.
this isnt acceptable
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.
is ignoring any request I have to remove me as a defendant
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.
16 million is maximum exposure to punitive damages so it actually could be more you never know
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.
Because it is hilarious
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:00 p.m.
And I agree it is hilarious
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.
But not when I am on the paying side of it
DevAX1TDevAX1T
is ignoring any request I have to remove me as a defendant
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.
I already told your new attorney to file a substitution
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.
like a million times
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.
that's how it works(edited)
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.
she needs to file a substitution or it's not in the record
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.
NOA doesn't suffice
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.
I honestly don’t mind
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.
if she can't file a substitution
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.
the record for this case is method 2 ngl
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.
imagine how she's gonna do going up against sado
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:01 p.m.
:🙏:
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:02 p.m.
in a case in which default was already entered
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:02 p.m.
:🙏:
ianian
imagine how she's gonna do going up against sado
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:02 p.m.
But that’s for her to handle. I said I don’t mind.
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:02 p.m.
alr
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:02 p.m.
anyways Id like to revisit the contempt ordeal
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:02 p.m.
Is it definitely a she? -tucks in chair-
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:03 p.m.
yeah :😳:
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:03 p.m.
well deep down I know women don't really exist
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:03 p.m.
but a man can hope
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:04 p.m.
@meowiitten We probably don’t even need a hearing.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:04 p.m.
Yeah. You're right.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:04 p.m.
-Starts crying tears of joy
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:05 p.m.
@singhski PLEASE
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:05 p.m.
The contempt
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:06 p.m.
I am not contempting him. He has already gone through so much in this case.
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:06 p.m.
he is not even being sued
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:06 p.m.
it's MPD
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:06 p.m.
he wont suffer at all
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:06 p.m.
bc the govt cant pay damages
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:06 p.m.
are you kidding
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:07 p.m.
First MPD’s counsel doesn’t file affirmative defenses and then he sees method 1
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:07 p.m.
what
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:07 p.m.
is method one
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:07 p.m.
:🙏:
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.
lowk im gonna just withdraw from this case and everyone can have it their way
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.
because honestly what is this
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.
I don’t have sixteen million
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.
What now
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.
Im actually just tryinna help these guys who r being sued and larp a bit but they bombard my DMs and post porn gifs???
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.
and they say Im a bad lawyer and get new ones
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.
like Im done bro
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.
Im crashing out
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.
npz crash out
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:08 p.m.
:😠:
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:09 p.m.
How can you forget to file affirmative defenses and then get angry that I didn’t accept the amended answer as if aff defenses are substantive rights rather than privileges(edited)
SinghskiSinghski
How can you forget to file affirmative defenses and then get angry that I didn’t accept the amended answer as if aff defenses are substantive rights rather than privileges(edited)
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:09 p.m.
I have 10k to my name Cuh
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:09 p.m.
What note
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:09 p.m.
No
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:09 p.m.
Now
SinghskiSinghski
How can you forget to file affirmative defenses and then get angry that I didn’t accept the amended answer as if aff defenses are substantive rights rather than privileges(edited)
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:09 p.m.
I didnt forget, and subsequently I didnt get angry
DevAX1TDevAX1T
I have 10k to my name Cuh
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.
Well I still need to assess damages
ianian
I didnt forget, and subsequently I didnt get angry
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.
*DOJ
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.
16mil for this is insane
SinghskiSinghski
*DOJ
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.
yeah on god they're
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.
they're something
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.
Keep in mind I didn’t do anything
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.
ok let me review sm rq
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:10 p.m.
I’m just here because sado thought he could add me here
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:11 p.m.
ok so
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:11 p.m.
here's what Im gonna do
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:11 p.m.
Im gonna stay
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:11 p.m.
representing city of mersea
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:11 p.m.
(township, not city @meowiitten)
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:11 p.m.
uh,
SinghskiSinghski
Well I still need to assess damages
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:12 p.m.
Can I just show you the video again and then list off damages for each count that we seek
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:12 p.m.
yeah and thats it
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:12 p.m.
wait
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:12 p.m.
yup . that's it
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:12 p.m.
Obviously we don't need to establish facts since they admitted to everything
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:12 p.m.
Im only defending township of mersea @singhski I withdraw from everything else
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:13 p.m.
since the defendants deserve to be sodomized against their will
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:13 p.m.
honestly
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:13 p.m.
I would love it if you gave me a chance to move to set aside the default tomorrow, I'll present a good case on behalf of the county
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:13 p.m.
but the rest of the defendants aren't my concern at this point
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:13 p.m.
I'm tired
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:14 p.m.
Attempt #3
meowiittenmeowiitten
Obviously we don't need to establish facts since they admitted to everything
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:14 p.m.
you do
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:14 p.m.
it's a suit against the governmetn
redneck
redneck 2025-08-18 10:15 p.m.
Your Honor, could you please check your direct messages.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:15 p.m.
The standard is "evidence that satisfies the court."
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:15 p.m.
That could be a scintilla
redneckredneck
Your Honor, could you please check your direct messages.
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:15 p.m.
@singhski Ill need that ex parte :👍:
meowiittenmeowiitten
The standard is "evidence that satisfies the court."
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:15 p.m.
yea
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:15 p.m.
still
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.
it's not really admitted
T4K3N
T4K3N 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.
Why is npv throwing ts
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.
Okay,
@meowiitten @ian
1. I will review the evidence tomorrow.
2. Redneck is not going to be held in contempt as of now.
3. Luhv can represent Ax1t without filing a substitution.
SinghskiSinghski
Okay, @meowiitten @ian 1. I will review the evidence tomorrow. 2. Redneck is not going to be held in contempt as of now. 3. Luhv can represent Ax1t w...
T4K3N
T4K3N 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.
Yo what’s good
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.
I also need to know if I can set aside default
T4K3N
T4K3N 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.
How are you today
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.
if you allow me to withdraw from everything except county
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.
and I need the ex parte from tactical
ian
ian 2025-08-18 10:16 p.m.
if he does dm you
ianian
if you allow me to withdraw from everything except county
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:17 p.m.
Well you wouldn’t be representing everyone else in that situation
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:18 p.m.
so your motion would only set aside default for the entity you are representing
SinghskiSinghski
Okay, @meowiitten @ian 1. I will review the evidence tomorrow. 2. Redneck is not going to be held in contempt as of now. 3. Luhv can represent Ax1t w...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:18 p.m.
Can I just show you the video again and then list off damages for each count that we seek
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:19 p.m.
EX PARTE DISCLOSURE
meowiittenmeowiitten
Can I just show you the video again and then list off damages for each count that we seek
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:22 p.m.
Sure.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:22 p.m.
OK.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:23 p.m.
@meowiitten Can you actually edit the video to list off damages for each count you seek
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:23 p.m.
I'll just do time stamp
singhski
singhski 2025-08-18 10:23 p.m.
kind of like those how many crimes did Walter White commit in Breaking Bad type videos
SinghskiSinghski
Okay, @meowiitten @ian 1. I will review the evidence tomorrow. 2. Redneck is not going to be held in contempt as of now. 3. Luhv can represent Ax1t w...
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:34 p.m.
@Kenzie
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:42 p.m.
So do I pay 600k total
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:42 p.m.
@meowiitten
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:43 p.m.
Can you not clog the chat buddy
DevAX1TDevAX1T
So do I pay 600k total
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:43 p.m.
No so how it works is
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:43 p.m.
Anyone can pay the share
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:43 p.m.
Like as long as it all adds up to the amount awarded
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:43 p.m.
It’s all on you @redneck
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:44 p.m.
Half of it
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:44 p.m.
If 1 million is awarded and one defendant has more money than you they can basically pay it for you
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:44 p.m.
I am merely joking
meowiittenmeowiitten
If 1 million is awarded and one defendant has more money than you they can basically pay it for you
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:44 p.m.
Ok
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-18 10:45 p.m.
DISMISSED: Counts 1, 2, 7 (as to Defendant Agents), 8 (as to Defendant Agents), 9, and 10
REMAINING: Counts 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Count 3: Failure to Intervene, Investigate, and Protect from Attack
Against: Defendants SudFortia and djnisnn
Maximum Punitive Damages Exposure: (No Cap)
Request (Compensatory): $400,000

Count 4: Monell Liability
Against: Defendant City of Mersea
Maximum Punitive Damages Exposure: (No Cap)
Request (Compensatory): $0 (No Treasury)
Declaratory Relief?: Yes

Count 5: Negligent Hiring, Training, and Supervision
Against: Defendants DevAX1T and MPD
Maximum Punitive Damages Exposure: $400,000
Compensatory: $200,000

Count 6: Negligent Hiring, Training, and Supervision
Against: Defendants T4K3Nw and MBI
Maximum Punitive Damages Exposure: $400,000
Compensatory: $200,000

Count 7: Negligence
Against: Defendants SudFortia and djnisnn
Maximum Punitive Damages Exposure: $500,000
Compensatory: $250,000

Count 8: Negligence Per Se
Against: Defendants SudFortia and djnisnn
Maximum Punitive Damages Exposure: $675,000
Compensatory: $325,000

Subtotal Compensatory = $1,375,000
Subtotal Punitive (if capped maximums used for 5–8) = $1,975,000
Grand Total = $3,350,000



VIDEO TIMESTAMPS (bolded when including live defendants):
Collision #1: 0:01 - 0:09 (Counts 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10)
Collision #2: 0:10 - 0:15 (Counts 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10)
Collision #3 (repeats twice): 0:15 - 1:40-ish (Counts 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10)
Collision #4: 1:42 - 1:49 (Counts 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10)
Collision #5 1:55 - 2:01 (Counts 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10)
Overarching Counts (the "moving forces" behind what occurred - failure to train, supervise, etc.): Counts 4, 5, 6

@singhski
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:47 p.m.
Interesting
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:47 p.m.
Interesting like the breakdown you provided
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:47 p.m.
It helps me comprehend the brainfuck that I just experienced
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:47 p.m.
So how long have you been a lawyer @meowiitten
DevAX1T
DevAX1T 2025-08-18 10:48 p.m.
I’m not sure how long but surely a decent bit of time
SinghskiSinghski
so your motion would only set aside default for the entity you are representing
ian
ian 2025-08-19 12:32 a.m.
Yes
SinghskiSinghski
EX PARTE DISCLOSURE
ian
ian 2025-08-19 12:33 a.m.
Uhm
ian
ian 2025-08-19 12:33 a.m.
Given it's the county's government that is being sued and MPD is an arm of the township
ian
ian 2025-08-19 12:33 a.m.
I don't really think I need consent
ian
ian 2025-08-19 12:34 a.m.
Regardless I did ask for it and I received a response from redneck
ian
ian 2025-08-19 12:34 a.m.
I'm not sure if he's DMing you so that I don't see it and don't get to respond? Or like
ian
ian 2025-08-19 12:34 a.m.
But I did ask him
ian
ian 2025-08-19 12:34 a.m.
He said yes
ian
ian 2025-08-19 12:35 a.m.
I think he is trying to pull some sort of ragebait or prolonging of the proceedings because he is not fond of bob and the rest of DA(edited)
ian
ian 2025-08-19 12:35 a.m.
Which I have to say is deeply unfortunate because I literally had nothing but the greatest intentions here to help MPD, I was not doing anything political
ian
ian 2025-08-19 12:36 a.m.
ian
ian 2025-08-19 12:37 a.m.
Again I'd move for redneck to be held in contempt for deliberately making false representations to the court, alongside what I mentioned originally
redneck
redneck 2025-08-19 10:20 a.m.
I'm not going to lie I forgot I said that
redneck
redneck 2025-08-19 10:39 a.m.
Your honor, I apologize. I forgot that he dmed me about the matter and I agreed as he was bugging me about it
redneck
redneck 2025-08-19 10:39 a.m.
I don't like either that he keeps saying i'm "Not fond of bob and the DA" which isn't true at all. I have 0 issues with bob and think he's a great guy
redneck
redneck 2025-08-19 10:40 a.m.
I just think that the county government was setup poorly and a lot of it illegally which there are already past rulings on.
redneckredneck
I just think that the county government was setup poorly and a lot of it illegally which there are already past rulings on.
ian
ian 2025-08-19 11:53 a.m.
MPD is part of the county government
ian
ian 2025-08-19 11:54 a.m.
You're referring to the county board / legislature part of the county government, which yes, was set up illegally
ian
ian 2025-08-19 11:54 a.m.
But I work for the DA's office
ian
ian 2025-08-19 11:55 a.m.
Even if I didn't that doesn't mean you can add the plaintiff, the judge, and 10 other random people to a privileged group chat
meowiittenmeowiitten
DISMISSED: Counts 1, 2, 7 (as to Defendant Agents), 8 (as to Defendant Agents), 9, and 10 REMAINING: Counts 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Count 3: Failure to Intervene, Investigate, and Protec...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-19 11:56 a.m.
@singhski
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-19 01:47 p.m.
@singhski -starts getting angry-
ianian
Even if I didn't that doesn't mean you can add the plaintiff, the judge, and 10 other random people to a privileged group chat
redneck
redneck 2025-08-19 08:08 p.m.
I added the people I was told to add
redneckredneck
I added the people I was told to add
ian
ian 2025-08-19 08:21 p.m.
Who told you to add them
redneck
redneck 2025-08-19 08:39 p.m.
My superior
redneckredneck
My superior
ian
ian 2025-08-19 08:39 p.m.
are you not the head of MPD
ian
ian 2025-08-19 08:39 p.m.
what superior could you possibly have
redneck
redneck 2025-08-19 10:19 p.m.
Theres people above me?
redneckredneck
Theres people above me?
ian
ian 2025-08-19 10:25 p.m.
No not really, no
ian
ian 2025-08-19 10:25 p.m.
..?
redneck
redneck 2025-08-19 10:37 p.m.
There is
ian
ian 2025-08-19 11:14 p.m.
Actually maybe
ian
ian 2025-08-19 11:14 p.m.
Hm
ianian
Actually maybe
redneck
redneck 2025-08-20 12:48 a.m.
I'm not going to lie I had no intentions of causing issues
redneck
redneck 2025-08-20 12:48 a.m.
I wasn't expecting them to do that
ian
ian 2025-08-21 10:33 p.m.
@singhski we agreed I could move to set aside
ian
ian 2025-08-21 10:33 p.m.
?
ian
ian 2025-08-21 10:34 p.m.
Or no
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:03 p.m.
@singhski two things
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:03 p.m.
one can I move to set aside
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:03 p.m.
two plaintiff has no counsel
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:03 p.m.
bc sado is now a judge, again
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:08 p.m.
I am still here
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:08 p.m.
He has counsel
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:18 p.m.
who
ianian
who
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:22 p.m.
Me?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:22 p.m.
I'm not commissioned yet
meowiittenmeowiitten
I'm not commissioned yet
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:27 p.m.
whatr
ianian
whatr
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:27 p.m.
To be commissioned I have to be sworn in and accept the commission
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:27 p.m.
Otherwise it would be violating my 13th amendment right
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:28 p.m.
right yes because that abolished involuntary servitude
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:28 p.m.
a decision I do not agree with
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:28 p.m.
And the Peonage Act of 1867
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-22 05:28 p.m.
As well as the Ku Klux Klan Act
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:56 p.m.
Don't forget about the Legalize Being Racist and Sleeping With Children as an Adult Act
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:56 p.m.
That's my favorite one
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:58 p.m.
LBRASWCAAA Act of 1789
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:58 p.m.
Same year as Hamilton being secretary of the the treasury and Jefferson coming back from France
ian
ian 2025-08-22 05:58 p.m.
I know that from the musical
Toby
Toby 2025-08-22 08:14 p.m.
Silence.
ian
ian 2025-08-22 08:15 p.m.
What how
ian
ian 2025-08-23 05:10 p.m.
@singhski pls pls pls pls pls
ian
ian 2025-08-23 05:10 p.m.
Can I move to set aside rn
ianian
Can I move to set aside rn
Toby
Toby 2025-08-23 07:27 p.m.
Set what aside
TobyToby
Set what aside
ian
ian 2025-08-23 07:31 p.m.
bro how can you talk here
ian
ian 2025-08-23 07:31 p.m.
The default
ianian
The default
Toby
Toby 2025-08-23 07:32 p.m.
On what grounds
TobyToby
On what grounds
ian
ian 2025-08-23 07:36 p.m.
BRO
ian
ian 2025-08-23 07:37 p.m.
Excusable neglect and mistake
XerxyXerxy used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-27 04:22 p.m.
Case Modified
@Xerxy has added @Ian to the case channel.
Ian
Ian 2025-08-27 04:49 p.m.
@singhski can I move to set aside
Ian
Ian 2025-08-27 08:58 p.m.
@singhski we're kind of stuck in time rn
Ian
Ian 2025-08-27 08:58 p.m.
like idk what we're doing
Ian
Ian 2025-08-28 07:21 p.m.
@singhski
Ian
Ian 2025-08-28 07:21 p.m.
:🙏:
MichaelEllerbee
MichaelEllerbee 2025-08-29 12:42 a.m.
?
singhski
singhski 2025-08-29 09:48 a.m.
@Ian yes you can
singhski
singhski 2025-08-29 09:48 a.m.
actually I will probably need to decide damages first(edited)
SinghskiSinghski
actually I will probably need to decide damages first(edited)
Ian
Ian 2025-08-29 02:43 p.m.
Yes that’s why I’m saying
Ian
Ian 2025-08-29 02:43 p.m.
Ordinarily I need you to do that first
Ian
Ian 2025-08-29 02:44 p.m.
But if you believe my motion to set aside would succeed, then the default damages would be moot
Ian
Ian 2025-08-29 02:44 p.m.
So for the purposes of the judicial economy you could grant me leave to move now
Ian
Ian 2025-08-29 02:45 p.m.
That’s only for the county-represented defendants, though
Ian
Ian 2025-08-29 06:40 p.m.
@singhski
singhski
singhski 2025-08-29 06:40 p.m.
@Ian let me finish this ruling
SinghskiSinghski
@Ian let me finish this ruling
Ian
Ian 2025-08-29 06:44 p.m.
alr
MichaelEllerbee
MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-02 04:12 p.m.
?
MichaelEllerbee
MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-07 09:36 p.m.
What next
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-09-12 10:15 a.m.
@singhski
MichaelEllerbee
MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-19 07:52 a.m.
Hello?????
MichaelEllerbee
MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-19 07:52 a.m.
It’s been a while.
shah_khaled ᴘᴄshah_khaled ᴘᴄ
@singhski
MichaelEllerbee
MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-20 12:27 p.m.
?
SinghskiSinghski
@Ian let me finish this ruling
MichaelEllerbee
MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-21 07:38 p.m.
?
MichaelEllerbee
MichaelEllerbee 2025-09-27 11:52 a.m.
Can someone help me. @𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘦 ♥
krabz
krabz 2025-10-05 06:50 p.m.
Transitional Case

This case existed prior to courts.clarkcounty.site shutting down. This card has been created to keep a record of the case’s existence; however, it will not be updated with past, present, or future case information.
Labels
Civil, Transitional Case
krabz pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:08 p.m.
MichaelEllerbee
MichaelEllerbee 2025-10-10 03:59 p.m.
So what now? @krabz I havent gottena response in this in months(edited)
krabz
krabz 2025-10-10 04:37 p.m.
this needs to be reassigned
krabz
krabz 2025-10-10 04:37 p.m.
singhsk iisnt judge anyokre
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-14 12:13 a.m.
@Kezzera@Xerxy@krabz@Your Local Dreamer pls reassign
krabz
krabz 2025-11-07 01:11 p.m.
Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge 40qh, under the supervision of Associate Justice krabzatonin (Ret.). Former District Judge Singhski (Ret.) no longer assigned to the case. (Clerk krabzatonin)
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-07 01:12 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Magistrate 40qh.
krabzkrabz used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-07 01:13 p.m.
Case Modified
@krabz has added @actxrz to the case channel.
krabzkrabz used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-07 01:13 p.m.
Case Modified
@krabz has added @bladevaz to the case channel.
krabzkrabz used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-07 01:13 p.m.
Case Modified
@krabz has added @MichaelEllerbee to the case channel.
krabz
krabz 2025-11-07 01:14 p.m.
where are we with this @actxrz @bladevaz @MichaelEllerbee
krabz
krabz 2025-11-09 01:19 p.m.
where are we with this @actxrz @bladevaz @MichaelEllerbee
krabzkrabz
where are we with this @actxrz @bladevaz @MichaelEllerbee
bladevaz
bladevaz 2025-11-10 07:45 p.m.
i withdraw
bladevazbladevaz
i withdraw
krabz
krabz 2025-11-10 08:18 p.m.
who were you representing
bladevaz
bladevaz 2025-11-11 04:44 a.m.
devax1t
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-13 02:20 a.m.
Ok
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-13 02:20 a.m.
With that in mind
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-13 02:20 a.m.
@actxrz @MichaelEllerbee Whats going on with this
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-14 01:23 a.m.
@actxrz @MichaelEllerbee
krabz
krabz 2025-11-14 09:35 p.m.
bladevaz withdraws from case
krabzkrabz used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-14 09:35 p.m.
Case Modified
@krabz has removed @bladevaz from the case channel.
krabz
krabz 2025-11-14 09:35 p.m.
@MichaelEllerbee @actxrz if there isnt an update we will be dismissing
krabz
krabz 2025-11-14 09:35 p.m.
idk what shapepnign
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-18 04:29 a.m.
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-18 04:29 a.m.
@Prothonotary's Office Archive in a day or two(edited)
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-18 04:29 a.m.
I would like to see if plaintiff/defendant sees this
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-11-18 04:31 a.m.
@MichaelEllerbee @actxrz
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️
@Prothonotary's Office Archive in a day or two(edited)
profile
profile 2025-11-18 05:11 a.m.
Isnt it in rulings
profile
profile 2025-11-18 05:11 a.m.
yeah..
profile
profile 2025-11-18 05:11 a.m.
Okay!
profileprofile used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-18 08:53 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-18 08:54 p.m.
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️
🇮🇱🎗️BurkinabéOperator🎗️ 2025-12-09 11:58 a.m.
@Prothonotary's Office Archive
profileprofile used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-10 06:50 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-10 06:50 p.m.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-12-10 06:52 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Volume XIV.
Exported 1192 messages